Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
Your argument allows for people to refuse to serve black people at lunch counters.

No - I'm not suggesting existing carveouts to protect civil rights should be removed.

Those carveouts don't apply to content moderation of political speech on websites.
87 posted on 05/02/2022 11:47:28 AM PDT by Observator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Observator
No - I'm not suggesting existing carveouts to protect civil rights should be removed.

Those carveouts don't apply to content moderation of political speech on websites.

So you are in favor of protecting civil rights on the one hand, but against it on the other hand?

I have the advantage of being consistent in principle in both cases.

Also, have you ever heard of the "incorporation doctrine"?

98 posted on 05/02/2022 12:40:48 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson