Dinesh D’Souza
@DineshDSouza
·
2h
A congressional election in 2018 was overturned on account of the same type of paid ballot trafficking we show in the movie. The volume of trafficking in that race was much less. Yet it satisfied the “but for” principle—“but for” the fraud the other guy would have won. Same here!
__________________________________________________________
Quote Tweet
Maxamegalon2000
@Maxamegalon2000
· 12h
Replying to @BrianHader and @POTUS
I’m not contesting the legality of ballot harvesting. I’m saying that even if everything in the film is true, I don’t know what basis there would be to invalidate any harvested ballots.
Speaking about FJB:
__________________________________________________________
James Woods
@RealJamesWoods
·
11h
If an individual won’t speak publicly unless a teleprompter is used, why bother to speak at all? Just send out a press release. And be sure to hire writers. Then eat some cookies. And watch some Matlock. Then take a nap.