Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: exit82

Northern Ireland will need to lose more than 1 million sheep and cattle to meet its new legally binding climate emissions targets, according to an industry-commissioned analysis seen by the Guardian.
The large-scale reduction in farm animals comes after the passing of the jurisdiction’s first ever climate act, requiring the farming sector to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 and reduce methane emissions by almost 50% over the same period. About a third of human-caused methane emissions come from livestock, mostly from the burps and manure of beef and dairy cattle. Analysis by KPMG, commissioned by industry representatives including the Ulster Farmers’ Union (UFU), estimates more than 500,000 cattle and about 700,000 sheep would need to be lost in order for Northern Ireland to meet the new climate targets. Separate analysis by the UK government’s climate advisers suggests chicken numbers would also need to be cut by 5 million by 2035. Agriculture accounts for about 27% of Northern Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions, with the vast majority coming from livestock. Its heavily export-driven meat industry principally supplies Great Britain, but it also exports to China and North America.

In related news, Bill Gates is spouting off about his view of meat. “I do think all rich countries should move to 100 percent synthetic beef. You can get used to the taste difference, and the claim is they’re going to make it taste even better over time,” he said.
Gates even went as far to say that governmental compulsion is an option.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/4026005/posts?page=312#312


112 posted on 05/01/2022 10:30:10 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (" When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat." -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Rusty0604

This will cause starvation worldwide. Then Bill Gates will promote Nuclear war to reduce the Human population. Or just a war between India, China, and Bangladesh.


113 posted on 05/01/2022 10:40:07 AM PDT by jennychase ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

“synthetic beef”

There is no such thing as synthetic beef. Any substance attempting to taste like beef with out containing beef should not be allowed to call itself beef. Congress can take care of this and should.

I realize that the left can, and does, simply change a definition to suit their propaganda purposes, for example: vaccine.


117 posted on 05/01/2022 11:10:05 AM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson