Agreed. The only "modeling" I want to see is this model as First Lady again. LOL
Posted on 04/29/2022 9:37:12 AM PDT by ransomnote
PING
Bidens ministry of disinformation is busy hiding the facts and promoting the lie thatnthe unvaxxed are more of a danger.
No need to read past that point. The same applies to "climate modeling," as far as that goes. Garbage.
Covid vaccine, applied every 4 to 5 months, including boosters, has a maximum efficacy of 10-15% after 14 to 15 months. One would need to continually get boosted or they would only have a slight advantage over an unvaccinated individual. This is according to UK studies on continuing efficacy. The science no longer supports vaccination. Perhaps a good reason why European nations, such as Denmark, have now suspended their vaccination programs.
Just wait until the FR Branch COVIDians show up to comment!
They seem to be admitting something....
Yep. Vaxxing is useless at best, more likely harmful than helpful.
Covidiots,
We should pity them.
“But with UK Government data showing the Covid-19 case-rate per 100,000 is significantly higher among the triple vaccinated population than it is among the unvaccinated population, and New Zealand Government data showing the Covid-19 hospitalisation-rate per 100,000 is also highest among the triple vaccinated, the conclusions of the paper don’t seem to match what’s happening in the real world.”
These statements are being made by people who have not done their own math.
To begin with the U.K. figures given on a per 100,00 population do not divide that into per 100,000 unvaccinated and 100,000 vaccinated - they are per 100,000 of the whole population.
But in every 100,000 people, in every age group in the U.K., the largest percentage of the population is vaccinated, so the vaccinated represent a larger percent than the unvaccinated in any 100,000 people.
Then if you consider that, and look at the raw humbers in each age group, and look at the tables for the % of that age group that is unvaccinated and the percent that is vaccinated, and do some math, you reach a different conclusion than the theme of the Expose.
What you see is yes the raw numbers of the vaccinated come out as infected or hospitalized than the unvaccinated, but in nearly every case the unvaccinated represent a larger percentage, infected or hospitalized, than the percentage that they are in that age group. If the unvaccinated are only 20% of an age group, then if they were doing radically better than the vaccinated in that age group, then less than 20% of them should be in an infected or hospitalized category for that age group. But the opposite appears to be true in most age groups. More of the unvaccinated, on a percentage basis compared to their percentage of an age group, are falling into an infected or hospitalized category than is true for the vaccinated in the same age group.
What seems more true to me is that while the unvacccinated are not doing radically better than the vaccinated, the vaccinated are not doing radically better than the unvaccinated. That comorbidities more than vaccination status are determining the rates of hospitalizations.
.
Do not take the Expose’s words at face value. They did not do the math and drew wrong conclusions from data they did not subject to their own analysis.
See my post #10.
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a type of cognitive bias in which people believe that they are smarter and more capable than they really are. Essentially, low ability people do not possess the skills needed to recognize their own incompetence. The combination of poor self-awareness and low cognitive ability leads them to overestimate their own capabilities.1 The term lends a scientific name and explanation to a problem that many people immediately recognize—that fools are blind to their own foolishness. As Charles Darwin wrote in his book The Descent of Man, "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge."
Yup. Basically saying: "Hey our frankenshots gave you AIDS, but lets blame it on the purebloods, just the same." And why not? The masktards already proved that they will believe anything.
True, but the vaccine isn’t a vaccine, and is garbage.
Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?
It is striking that all marketed SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are developed for intramuscular administration designed to produce humoral and cell mediated immune responses, preventing viremia and the COVID-19 syndrome. They have a high degree of efficacy in humans (70–95%) depending on the type of vaccine. However, little protection is provided against viral replication and shedding in the upper airways due to the lack of a local sIgA immune response, indicating a risk of transmission of virus from vaccinated individuals....
Though striking is not the word I'd use.
In other words:
The Vaccine is useless, actually worse than useless since the un jabbed can cause the jabbed to become sick from the disease they took the jab to protect them from...
Why aren’t these people LOCKED up in a Sanitarium yet or Prison??
1. The VAX does not work.
2. Men cannot get pregnant.
Agreed. The only "modeling" I want to see is this model as First Lady again. LOL
“Unvaccinated People Increase Risk Of Covid Infection Among Vaccinated, Study Finds”
Yes, of course.
Bet these are the same folks who claim that wearing masks work too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.