Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative98

I’m not a attorney but it would seem that Mr Baldwin should be facing a charge of gross negligence manslaughter. After all, hasn’t he shout to the rooftops how dangerous firearms are?


25 posted on 04/28/2022 8:51:27 AM PDT by lakeman (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lakeman
I’m not a attorney but it would seem that Mr Baldwin should be facing a charge of gross negligence manslaughter.

I am an attorney.

I think it's unlikely he'll be charged with a crime. Criminal law is about intent. The person either has to intend to cause the result or must be acting so recklessly that the result was likely to occur. I believe it will be determined by prosecutors or a grand jury that Baldwin reasonably relied on the assertion that it was a cold gun and thus his actions did not rise to the level of criminality. Don't get me wrong, I despise the guy and would love to see him spend years in jail, but I don't think it's going to happen.

I do think he will be subject to civil liability to the survivors, though. That's a simple negligence standard, which is a much lower standard than criminal negligence. Hopefully, he will be drained of everything he has.

51 posted on 04/28/2022 10:33:42 AM PDT by KevinB (''...and to the Banana Republic for which it stands ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson