https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115871
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/lenr/index?tab=articles
Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science
—
For beginners:
http://lenr-canr.org/
Click on “Introduction”
https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=263
Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y
Acronyms:
LENR: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions. [Also Lattice Enabled Nuclear Reactions, but seldom used]
CANR: Chemical Assisted Nuclear Reactions [fallen into disuse along with LANR/Lattice Assisted Nuclear Reactions]
CMNS: Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
LCF: Lattice Confined Fusion [NASA’s term for it]
AHE: Anomolous Heating Effect. Also PFAHE, for the Pons-Fleischmann AHE.
Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette
https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp
Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
“If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc.” ~Jim Robinson
The issue isn’t whether we allow skepticism, it is whether we allow hyperskeptics and skeptopaths to ruin the scientific dialog. Such FReepers who persist in polluting these threads have been asked to leave, and we are asking that they open their own threads if they have comments.
“This topic has a following, people who wish to learn and discuss the materials presented. Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue. Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter.” ~ Sidebar Moderator https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3977426/posts?page=19#19 —————————————————————————————————————
links
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572665721008973
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115871
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-electroanalytical-chemistry/most-downloaded-articles
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6716-useful-papers-thread/?postID=178368#post178368
But since the belief in the possibility of cold fusion was a minority view that defied the scientific consensus, any discussion of it should have been deemed “misinformation” and banned. /s
Still trying to turn lead in to gold.
It was more than 30 years ago when cold fusion was supposedly shown.
But it’s still like Bigfoot, elusive but some people believe it.
“It’s not pathological science”
Translation: It is NOT a psychological process in which a scientist, originally conforming to the scientific method, unconsciously veers from that method, and begins a pathological process of wishful data interpretation.
I needed to make that clear for myself and I hope it serves others reading this thread.
Thank you for another interesting article.
Thanks Kevmo.