PANDA's Marc Girardot on how the COVID vaccines damage your body

Your pearl clutching is noted. Malone, Kori, McCullough, et al., show how wrong your mischaracterization is.

FR is a good site. That’s why people like you come here to prey on people who are otherwise so busy living their lives and supporting the cause of freedom around the world to follow suppressed truth about the vax; you MAY be able to mislead them into harm’s way by falsely distorting the record of the ‘vaccines’ and minimizing the harm the’shots’ cause.

Poo Flingers!

Follow The SCIENCE,
correct ?
.
Poo Flinger.

Thanks for the ping!

Still wondering about the safety of the blood supply...

I don’t want to disparage you, but I do want you to become aware of the misinterpretations that Mr. Bridel makes in his claims. The Idea that the antigen peptides go throughout the blood stream is the result of imagination rather than scientific fact. That misinformation has roamed through the social media since a You Tube video made on June 13, 2021. I can remember such claims were made before that. It is the nature of these false claims littering the COVID landscape— they have a life of their own just like that pesky wack-o-mole.

Just to help you cover all the bases of this false science (I call it ‘non-science’), I give you this piece that puts it all together for you:

Title: “COVID-19 Vaccine-Generated Spike Protein is Safe, Contrary to Viral Claims”

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/scicheck-covid-19-vaccine-generated-spike-protein-is-safe-contrary-to-viral-claims/

The”Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Harvard Medical School” reported here:

Title: “Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine response in pregnant and lactating women: a cohort study,”

—has been peer reviewed. Kathryn Gray, attending physician of maternal-fetal medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and the lead author of one such study in the United States, told AFP on December 16, 2021 that: “There are no safety signals in lactating or pregnant individuals.”

Similarly, data from Ontario that showed that “rates of pregnancy and birth outcomes among vaccinated individuals do not suggest any pattern of increased risk.”

That study authored by Kathryn Gray concluded:

“COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy and lactation generated robust humoral immunity similar to that observed in nonpregnant women with similar side effect profiles. Although humoral immune response and side effects are only 2 of many considerations for pregnant women and their care providers in weighing whether or not to be vaccinated against COVID-19 in pregnancy, these data confirm that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines result in comparable humoral immune responses in pregnant and lactating women with those observed in nonpregnant populations.” That study, which is highly technical, is found here:

https://perma.cc/ENY3-TNEW

Finally, debunking the June 13, 2021 You Tube video (no longer available because of false information) that claims,

Title: “The COVID-19 vaccines’ “spike protein is very dangerous, it’s cytotoxic.”

Here is the PolitiFact analysis of that video:

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jun/16/youtube-videos/no-sign-covid-19-vaccines-spike-protein-toxic-or-c/

That fact check concludes what I tried to tell you in my post:

“COVID-19 vaccines work by triggering the human body’s natural immune response, without introducing a form of the COVID-19 virus itself.”

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled PANDA's Marc Girardot on how the COVID vaccines damage your body, jonrick46 wrote:

I don’t want to disparage you, but I do want you to become aware of the misinterpretations that Mr. Bridel makes in his claims. The Idea that the antigen peptides go throughout the blood stream is the result of imagination rather than scientific fact. That misinformation has roamed through the social media since a You Tube video made on June 13, 2021. I can remember such claims were made before that. It is the nature of these false claims littering the COVID landscape— they have a life of their own just like that pesky wack-o-mole.

Just to help you cover all the bases of this false science (I call it ‘non-science’), I give you this piece that puts it all together for you:

Title: “COVID-19 Vaccine-Generated Spike Protein is Safe, Contrary to Viral Claims”

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/scicheck-covid-19-vaccine-generated-spike-protein-is-safe-contrary-to-viral-claims/

The”Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Harvard Medical School” reported here:

Title: “Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine response in pregnant and lactating women: a cohort study,”

—has been peer reviewed. Kathryn Gray, attending physician of maternal-fetal medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and the lead author of one such study in the United States, told AFP on December 16, 2021 that: “There are no safety signals in lactating or pregnant individuals.”

Similarly, data from Ontario that showed that “rates of pregnancy and birth outcomes among vaccinated individuals do not suggest any pattern of increased risk.”

That study authored by Kathryn Gray concluded:

“COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy and lactation generated robust humoral immunity similar to that observed in nonpregnant women with similar side effect profiles. Although humoral immune response and side effects are only 2 of many considerations for pregnant women and their care providers in weighing whether or not to be vaccinated against COVID-19 in pregnancy, these data confirm that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines result in comparable humoral immune responses in pregnant and lactating women with those observed in nonpregnant populations.” That study, which is highly technical, is found here:

https://perma.cc/ENY3-TNEW

Finally, debunking the June 13, 2021 You Tube video (no longer available because of false information) that claims,

Title: “The COVID-19 vaccines’ “spike protein is very dangerous, it’s cytotoxic.”

Here is the PolitiFact analysis of that video:

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jun/16/youtube-videos/no-sign-covid-19-vaccines-spike-protein-toxic-or-c/

That fact check concludes what I tried to tell you in my post:

“COVID-19 vaccines work by triggering the human body’s natural immune response, without introducing a form of the COVID-19 virus itself.”

I've already exposed politifact and factcheck.org as fake news serving 'the narrative' and enemies of truth/free speech, and that's why you use them to try to confuse people into trusting the 'vaccine'. Anyone wishing to check that out can look up conservative topics like President Trump and Russia Russia Russia hoax and find that those outlets are information control/propaganda hubs.

We've seen conservative voices purged everywhere and you cite the removal of a youtube video with approval. Is there no limit to your ideal censorship achievements?

You call truth misinformation and work to veil the evidence against the 'vaccines' from the public, and you do it citing our enemie's propaganda hubs.

Yours is a typical refutation and an absurd clinging to totally baseless anti-vaccine claims. I bet you did not read one sentence from the fact checkers I gave in my links. Just because they are named fact checkers or PolyFact does not mean they are those left wing kooks at this link:

https://www.factcheck.org/

Instead you follow Girardot’s analysis of the COVID vaccine. It opens you up to ridicule. How can you follow this rich techie who has no knowledge of infectious disease, virology, molecular biology, or other relevant disciplines to comment on COVID-19 vaccines? Only one totally ignorant of virology would swallow the non-science of Girardot—and that is what he depends upon. To do that puts you in league with someone out of the Middle Ages telling everyone that it is miasma that was causing the plague. In Girardot’s case, it is the vaccine that is causing the sickness. In the same sense, like Girardot, you too have no clue what you are talking about.

-1 for ransomnote.

See my links on this FR thread...

More Cardiac Abnormalities Seen in People Living With HIV

Especially my reply #8.

I am not understanding your post #8. However I appreciate your link to HIV’s impact on heart disease. I have been commenting on HIV/AIDS impact on the immune system’s inability to benefit from the COVID-19 vaccination for months. I say, how does one expect their immune system to be primed by the vaccine when it isn’t working? I suspect other irregularities associated with the vaccine are also happening.

To my mind it’s further proof, as of it were needed, that CoupFlu has NEVER been about public health.

Keep in mind that detailed medical histories are not being taken from people before they are shot up.

That more primary care providers, the people most familiar with their patients’ histories, did not register with Fedzilla to become approved CoupFlu vaccinators. And, boy, is Rand Paul terminally incurious on that last one...

People are finding out the hard way.

This should never have happened.

In ‘76/’77, the Swine Flu vaxx was pulled after fewer than 3 dozen deaths and 500 injuries.

But the CoupFlu vaxxes are still being pushed for a disease thats far less likely to kill you than you are to be injured by a vaxx.

...most primary care providers...

It is so sad to see FR taken over by Covid conspiracists, misinformationists, and pseudoscience charlatanism. This used to be such a good site.

FR is, and always has been, a WONDERFUL site…for conservatives.

Talk about spreading misinformation. Look in the mirror demmom.

Maybe you could use another 4 month - or, longer - break, if you find this site so repulsive. 🤔

But the CoupFlu vaxxes are still being pushed for a disease thats far less likely to kill you than you are to be injured by a vaxx.

^^ THAT ^^

Vaxxes that can protect an individual and the public can also harm or kill.

There’s a cost/benefit to each and every vaxx.

Which is why informed consent is crucial

And that is what we DO NOT HAVE with the CoupFlu vaxxes.

You're carrying water for fake fake checkers who help censor informationt hat counter's Biden/fAUCI narrative? Whose side are you on? The side of censorship and towing the party line?

What has Fauci's credentials done for us? Doctors who go against the Fauci narrative are threatened/fired/stripped of hospital access and grant funding and you know this, but you pretend there's no censorship. So spokespersons without credentials team up with experts to carry the message and so you attack the spokesman.

You ignorantly ridicule the messenger without acknowledging that he's with the organization known as PANDA.

"A group of multi-disciplinary professionals, who perceived the global reaction to Covid, and lockdown in particular, as overwrought and damaging to the point of causing a great tear in the fabric of society, established PANDA (Pandemics Data & Analytics) in April 2020. As a politically and economically independent organisation, PANDA seeks to develop science-based explanations and test them against international data. Policy recommendations for governments and other institutions can be developed from these. PANDA stands for open science and rational debate, for replacing flawed science with good science and for retrieving liberty and prosperity from the clutches of a dystopian “new normal”."

Just your stance alone on this issue reveals your support for the Biden/Fauci crimes. You've seen plenty of data proving that Covid is nowhere near as severe as the liars said it was, that alternative treatments work well (Zelenko, McCullough etc. Ivermectin/HCQ). All those articles you pretend don't exist, and you ignore all the problems with crushing the truth with fake fact checkers (a few links below) including politifact.

How Propagandists Co-Opted ‘Fact-Checkers’ and the Press to Control the Information Landscape [EPOCH TIMES interviews Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson]
2/10/2022, 10:45:31 AM · by ransomnote · 32 replies
rumble.com ^ | January 20, 2022 | EpochTV (The Epoch Times), Jan Jekielek, Sharyl Attkisson
[H/T Jayster ]ransomnote: I found this video interview wide-ranging, informative and quite enjoyable to watch. In my opinion, Attkisson contributes comprehensive and detailed insights in an accessible manner not found elsewhere. The video is one hour in duration and worth every minute.Rumble — “Virtually every piece of information that can be co-opted has been, whether it’s Wikipedia online, fact-checkers, the news,” says five-time Emmy Award-winning investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson. “This is all part of a very well-funded, well-organized landscape that dictates and slants the information they want us to have.”Attkisson is the host of Full Measure and author of “Slanted:...

True or false? Reuters "fact check" of the Denmark study showing negative VE
1/20/2022, 11:24:39 AM · by ransomnote · 9 replies
substack.com ^ | January 19, 2022 | Steve Kirsch
Reuters did a "fact check" of the negative Vaccine Efficacy in the Denmark study and the study author used a hand waving argument to conclude the negative VE is due to a bias. What do you think?Steve Kirsch13 hr ago I wrote earlier about the Denmark study showing that vaccine efficacy against Omicron goes negative after 90 days:There is a Reuters “fact check” that says that the author claimed that the vaccines are fine and that the negative vaccine efficacy reported in the paper was simply due to a “bias.”Oh really???Here’s why I think the Reuters “fact check” is garbageFirst...
COVID-19 misinformation is a public health crisis but nobody is willing to stop it by debating us
3/2/2022, 9:02:27 AM · by ransomnote · 14 replies
substack.com ^ | 3/1/22 | Steve Kirsch
The California legislature has officially declared COVID-19 misinformation a public health CRISIS, yet the head of California's HHS will do nothing to stop it. Neither will anyone else.Steve Kirsch21 hr ago COVID-19 misinformation is a major problem. Check out this headline:It’s so easy to stop COVID-19 misinformation. Just debate the top misinformation spreaders. Problem solved. It will be obvious which side is the purveyor of false information.Fact check this: No fact checker organization will debate usI told PolitiFact that if they really wanted to stop misinformation, all they had to do was debate us. The PolitiFact Editor in Chief,...
The great debate: PolitiFact vs. "the world's top misinformation spreaders"
2/26/2022, 4:24:44 PM · by ransomnote · 5 replies
substack.com ^ | 2/26/22 | Steve Kirsch
We've challenged PolitiFact to a live, recorded debate earlier today. The two parties are polar opposites: one defends the narrative and the other exposes the truth.Steve Kirsch21 hr ago The request from PolitiFact to remove the fact check recordingRecently, I got an email from PolitiFact’s Editor-in-Chief, Angie Holan, requesting I remove the recording of my conversation with their so-called “fact checker,” Gabrielle Settles who was doing a fact check on VAERS.I refused her request.Gabrielle asked if she could record the call and I consented, so that entitles all parties to record the call. PolitiFact did not deny that we both...
Fact checks fail to explain away the telltale blood clots found by embalmers after the COVID vax rollout
substack.com ^ | 214/22 | Steve KIrsch
Posted on 2/14/2022, 7:27:27 PM by ransomnote
You pretend the actual truth escaping the censors is a lie and keep trying to herd us back into the fold, back to the fact checkers. You have no shame. Can't you get a job with NPR or CNN or someone like that, someone who could really use your natural interests and loyalties? Seeing what you are doing here on FR, do you honestly think I care what 'score' you give ME??

I will read up on all your threads when time permits.

The one link to “Epoch Time’s” interview with Sharyl Attkisson really interested me. I watched the entire interview. I have met Sharyl Attkisson at a presentation at the headquarters of Seattle’s KVI Radio. This was when her computer was hacked in an effort to smear her. Her thoughts on the Wohan Institute of Virology as the source of the COVID virus was related in an early “Epoch Time’s” You Tube video. Every time there is talk about that lab as the source, I write, “Where is Huang Yanling?” If you know, Mr. ransomnote, let us know.

I also suspect that Fauci was having his pockets lined with CCP money to facilitate the gain of function research at the institute. I believe he gave them U.S. science on gene splicing technology and gained financially for it. This is why he was so deceptive in his Senate testimony that Senator Rand Paul tried to get from him. Fauci, I believed, entrenched himself in the Trump Administration to protect himself from being discovered. If Trump had won a second term, I believe he would have Fauci fired and China backed up to the wall for the damage they did. The world needs reparations. Why this has not been pursued is because the CCP has blackmail material against the Biden Crime Syndicate’s influence peddling. It has all the making of the political scandal of the century.

I tried to find out who was on Steve Kirsh’s team of experts for the open debate with PolyFact. I tried to copy and paste the link he gave, for that information. I was curious about the folks Kirsh was listening to. The link went nowhere:

https://stevekirsh.substack.com/p/my-team-of-vaccine-safety-experts?utm_source=url

Now I am in a time crunch that does not allow much time to respond to all the issues of your response. It was for a TV production but CNN+ crashed, but now it has become an epic movie project now taking shape. Going to the fact checkers like Reuters saves me a lot of time. My logic is, if Reuters says something wrong, the science community will raise hell about it. So far, I have not seen it and have double-checked what other sources say.

One thing I want to correct is, just because I used fact check sources does not mean I am a yes-man for the Dark Forces of Biden and the Leftnick ilk. I’m in pursuit of the truth. Let’s go Brandon.

Well said.

Here’s a gem illustrating the direction that a certain group has taken FR:

COVID is a lab engineered SNAKE venom mix...

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4055554/posts

“Yes, but SNAKE venom is the driving killer protein code for all COVID infections.”

Our detractors couldn’t make this stuff up. So “our side” does it for them.

How Propagandists Co-Opted ‘Fact-Checkers’ and the Press to Control the Information Landscape [EPOCH TIMES interviews Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson]

True or false? Reuters "fact check" of the Denmark study showing negative VE

COVID-19 misinformation is a public health crisis but nobody is willing to stop it by debating us

The great debate: PolitiFact vs. "the world's top misinformation spreaders"