[rdcbn1]

There is plenty of legit, high quality evidence out there. Observational studies, meta data analysis and formal peer reviewed clinical research. It ranges from basic physiological mechanisms to clinical data to statistics on morbidity . Much of it is emerging and in progress. Various serious concerns such as myocarditus, venous thrombosis and micro clotting events as well as immune system dis regulation are well documented beyond any shadow of a doubt as very real negative side effects. Only the scope and severity of the concerns and how big of a down stream problem are we facing remain open to speculation.

[Fury]

“...beyond any shadow of a doubt...”

Please stop. That’s a similar sort of statement that people who are absolutely certain about anthropogenic climate change make. Things like “the science is settled”. Science is rarely settled as new research is conducted. “Beyond any shadow of a doubt falls into that category”.

I was referring to McCullough and research or a review of research he has submitted. He was a co-author (or lead) on COVID-19 treatment I believe. He’s being lazy by not compiling something akin in the history discipline to an annotated bibliography - that outlines in writing research that backs up his claims.