Posted on 04/20/2022 6:53:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
30 year trends of temperature are shown to be lower, using well-sited high quality NOAA weather stations that do not require adjustments to the data.
NEW STUDY OF NOAA’S U.S. CLIMATE NETWORK SHOWS A LOWER 30-YEAR TEMPERATURE TREND WHEN HIGH QUALITY TEMPERATURE STATIONS UNPERTURBED BY URBANIZATION ARE CONSIDERED
The average depth of the oceans today is around 12,100 feet.
Sea levels have risen around 10 inches the last 150 years which is miniscule, and essentially immeasurable in oceans that average 12,100 feet deep.
Does any one think all the world oceans can be measured accurately within 10 inches? Could there have been some erosion at the bottom or at coastlines from pounding waves that may make oceans appear deeper than they are?
Well then, you heretic you. LOL! Facts? They don’t care about no steenkin’ facts. Because branDUHn said if it’s a choice between “facts” and “truth”, they’ll pick “truth”. Sadly a LOT of people have bought all in. Besides, we’re sinking, the oceans just sit there. LOL! I demand we bring back Pangea!
Also the sun exerts 2500 times more influence on the earth than anything that man can do. And the radiation from the sun fluctuates, thus affecting temperatures here on earth. Remember Chicken Little?
Bingo! Exactly correct.
When you take into account that the earth is not a perfect sphere and there’s gravity anomalies plus tides from the moon, how in the heck can you measure the difference. When sea level gets to 4000ft then I’ll worry or enjoy ocean front property.
Bookmark
Great article!
The urban heat island effect is real, but modest warming since 1860 due to recovery from the little ice age is real also. About .1 degree per decade. It is not a problem, but mostly a benefit. The alarmists will not publicize real data because it is infinitesimal compared to the dire catastrophes they predict. They rely on computer models, which have never been able even to postdict accurately, and never will. And their predictions of doom have yet to come to pass.
Most importantly for political reasons, there is no correlation between CO2 level in the atmosphere and “average global temperature.” While CO2 level has been increasing on a gradual straight line, greening the earth as it rises, temperatures have fluctuated up and down significantly over the last 100 years. That alone should dismiss the whole ball of wax from serious consideration.
I appreciate the graph, do you have a reference for where it came from?
Thanks!
Duh!
I posted that fact here 15 years ago.
Absolutely, it is from NOAA themselves and puts reality in perspective. They used to have a webpage you could hot link the images from. I see they transformed it to a PDF so that it is harder to share.
But the image among others showing the same reality are still available in 3rd party image searches.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=NOAA+Glacial+interglacial+periods&iax=images&ia=images&pn=1
One thing about these models. If they are so wonderful, how come we never hear about how accurate they are when run backwards?
There’s a simple solution to the Climate Church of today. Offer grad students money to prove them wrong in similar sums to what has been spent to come up with this bs.
btt
Fake journalists are part of the climate hoax and push it daily as instructed by their libtard masters 🤪
China is an “all of the above” country.
They’re building coal, gas, nuclear, solar, wind...
Unlike us, they have a sane and pragmatic energy policy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.