Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Should Back Democrats’ 2020 Bill on Removing Presidents for Incapacity
Breitbart ^ | 4/19/2022 | Joel B. Pollack

Posted on 04/19/2022 8:32:41 AM PDT by simpson96

Republicans should rally around a 2020 proposal backed by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to make it easier to remove presidents for mental incapacity under the 25th Amendment to the Constitution, based on Joe Biden’s recent behavior.

On Monday, at a White House Easter egg roll, Biden appeared confused and unsure of what to do or where to go. He stumbled as he attempted to read a children’s book, and was interrupted by a costumed Easter bunny when he attempted to address the media. Apparently the bunny, a press aide, had been assigned to direct the president’s movements at the event.

Biden’s behavior sparked mockery, but also concern: is the leader of the free world being directed by the Easter bunny?

In October 2020 — on a much flimsier pretext — Pelosi and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) re-introduced a bill to establish what Raskin called the Commission on Presidential Capacity to Discharge the Powers and Duties of Office. The idea was to create a process for evaluating a sitting president and then removing him or her from office if necessary, given mental incapacity.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., left, poses during a ceremonial swearing-in with Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., right, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 3, 2019, during the opening session of the 116th Congress. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

At the time, Breitbart News reported that Pelosi aimed the legislation at Trump:

“He will face the judgment of the voters, but he shows the need to create a process for future presidents,” Pelosi said.

“Congress has a constitutional duty to lay out the process by which a president’s incapacity” is determined, Pelosi continued before adding “But we are reminded of the necessity of this action by the health of the current president.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: nuts; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2022 8:32:41 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: simpson96

If it is made easier to remove a president, you can be absolutely certain the Dems will use it when it’s unwarranted.


2 posted on 04/19/2022 8:35:23 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

We need him to hang on at least until Jan. 20, 2023. Either that or when the new congress takes over. 2 weeks earlier. Don’t know why.


3 posted on 04/19/2022 8:35:40 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
Congress has a constitutional duty to lay out the process by which a president’s incapacity

Maybe the executive should be able to boot the Speaker of the House. Checks and balances.

4 posted on 04/19/2022 8:36:18 AM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." — M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Yeah, cuz that’ll work out so well.


5 posted on 04/19/2022 8:36:24 AM PDT by VTenigma (Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

No. It is a poison pill to remove any Republican.


6 posted on 04/19/2022 8:36:42 AM PDT by dynachrome ("I will not be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

There’s no such thing as a “good” Democrat bill.


7 posted on 04/19/2022 8:36:43 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Cool by me. We need to quit electing doddering old fools to public office. While I have tremendous love and respect for my elders, the reality of diminished physical vigor and cognitive ability just cannot be ignored.

Politicians should be required to abide by the mandatory retirement age.


8 posted on 04/19/2022 8:37:00 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and don't wish to smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Democrats have done nothing of note for years and I for one am against everything they are behind 110%. The leadership is nothing but liars and cheats.

Any and all rank and file registered democrats are simply too stupid to pay attention to.


9 posted on 04/19/2022 8:37:31 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (Let's go Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

LOL. It would only be used against Republicans. Never against Democrats. Republicans should not sign on to ANY legislation with the rats. Not at this point.


10 posted on 04/19/2022 8:38:49 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Nope. Keep the lying POS there until he can be impeached — like 20 times.

A goal for 2022 House — most impeachments. Don’t need to remove him; just impeach for every lie told, every check accepted, every kid abused.


11 posted on 04/19/2022 8:39:56 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

12 posted on 04/19/2022 8:40:02 AM PDT by throwthebumsout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Kamala Harris


13 posted on 04/19/2022 8:40:36 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

😎👍


14 posted on 04/19/2022 8:42:18 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Precisely. I think this idea is terrible.
Same for “insurrection” being abused to try and disqualify candidates.


15 posted on 04/19/2022 8:42:48 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Wildly unconstitutional. If they want to put that into effect, it would take another Amendment.


16 posted on 04/19/2022 8:43:21 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

They knew he was like this in 2019 and early 2020 before COVID hit. They wanted Trump out.


17 posted on 04/19/2022 8:43:37 AM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: clee1

There’s a minimum age, and there should be a maximum age.
That said, this bill, and idea, sucks.


18 posted on 04/19/2022 8:44:01 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Exactly. When I read that, I decided absolutely, 100% I will not support it for exactly and precisely that reason.

WTF. Conservatives are falling for this?


19 posted on 04/19/2022 8:45:20 AM PDT by rlmorel (Democrats running things is termite infestation, and the exterminator won't be here for 3 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

The 25th Amendment is all that is required.

Congress has no say in this except they can pass a resolution.


20 posted on 04/19/2022 8:48:04 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (We are being played by forces most do not understand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson