To: Beowulf9
Yet just seven, or 0.4%, of the globe’s 1,645 billionaires openly identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender.
So what is the implication? That somehow it’s discriminatory against these “LGBT” that there aren’t enough in the billionaire group to make the writer of this article happy?
To: Dilbert San Diego
“Forget it, Jake. It’s Forbes.”
6 posted on
04/19/2022 8:20:30 AM PDT by
rlmorel
(Democrats running things is termite infestation, and the exterminator won't be here for 3 years.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
It’s funny because most of the world is not insane enough to ignore common sense and go on “identifying” as something else, and that’s what makes the numbers so small.
However, no matter what, the US will be blamed as not tolerant, accepting and celebratory enough, and needs to be more indoctrinated.
9 posted on
04/19/2022 8:22:44 AM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVd)
To: Dilbert San Diego
The implication?
Meet your new masters.
17 posted on
04/19/2022 8:57:49 AM PDT by
Salman
(It's not a "slippery slope" if it was part of the program all along. )
To: Dilbert San Diego
Globo-homo. And just think: this is only the beginning of troubles, the birth pangs.
26 posted on
04/19/2022 10:21:31 AM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(Hold on, y'all, 2022 is going to be a ride you won't soon forget!)
To: Dilbert San Diego
3% of all that are tranny or a sodomite, that is what I would infer from this. That is giving them a boost.
30 posted on
04/19/2022 1:38:13 PM PDT by
Glad2bnuts
((“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer,)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson