Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNA Mutation Research Reveals Why Most Smokers Never Get Lung Cancer
Scitechdaily ^ | 4.12.2022 | Albert Einstein college of medicine

Posted on 04/13/2022 6:41:44 AM PDT by libh8er

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 04/13/2022 6:41:44 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libh8er

That first sentence makes NO sense!


2 posted on 04/13/2022 6:44:23 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement! There)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

So smokers ARE mutants! I knew it!!!


3 posted on 04/13/2022 6:47:20 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milagro

People who get lung cancer in the US are overwhelmingly smokers.

That is a small subset of all the US people who smoke, most who do not get lung cancer.

I wonder if this research is connected to research on how smokers were somehow covid protected.


4 posted on 04/13/2022 6:48:09 AM PDT by Chickensoup ( Leftists totalitarian fascists are eradicating conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: milagro
Actually ... if true ... it does.

IF ... ALL lung disease is from smoking.

ALL death is the result of a heart ceasing to beat, but the CAUSE of that cessation could be one reason over another.

IF ALL lung cancer is caused by smoking, but only a few get it ... it is still a true statement

5 posted on 04/13/2022 6:53:35 AM PDT by knarf (?<p>Little kids grow up to be adults that get into powerful positions and act out their thoughts.<pg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

My Father in Law smoked until he was 85. He died of complications caused when he fell off his motorcycle.

You’d think he was in a biker-gang, but he was actually a (retired) CEO of a property development company.


6 posted on 04/13/2022 6:56:16 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

The majority of smokers do not get lung cancer. But all smokers suffer lung function impairment.

When I was a young man in college and smoked I figured the only thing one had to worry about with smoking was lung cancer. And since I was 20 years old I wasn’t going to get lung cancer. It was great to be immortal. Too bad it didn’t last LOL


7 posted on 04/13/2022 6:57:36 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

So, you agree with the premise that lung disease can NEVER be experienced by ANYONE who is a non-smoker?


8 posted on 04/13/2022 7:20:14 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement! There)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

My parents, and 3 older siblings all smoked. I was the only one who never smoked. Both parents and a sister died of lung cancer. That sister had stopped smoking five years before being diagnosed. My only brother stopped smoking after having a heart attack at the age of 48. He died of a massive heart attack at 51. My oldest sister was an alcoholic. She was diagnosed with early onset of dementia because of her alcoholism, and spent 30+ years housed in a psych center, and in adult-assisted living homes in her later years. Because of smoking restrictions, she eventually stopped smoking, and died at the age of 74 of a stroke. I’m 74 now, will turn 75 in August if the Lord lets me.


9 posted on 04/13/2022 7:21:02 AM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milagro

That first sentence makes NO sense!


It makes perfect sense to me. All it is saying is that of the cases of lung cancer that exist, smoking is usually the cause, but most smokers don’t get lung cancer.

To use imaginary numbers:

1000 cases of lung cancer.
900 of them are smokers.
9,000,000 smokers.

i.e. only a small number of smokers actually get lung cancer, which is why, using my “imaginary number” example, there are not 8 million cases of lung cancer.

I’ve been anti smoking for over 50 years but finally had to acknowledge about 25 years ago that though smoking can cause cancer, merely smoking is not nearly as high a risk of lung cancer as I thought. Being afraid of smoking is like being afraid to ride in a car without a seat belt. Sure, you “might” die. But statistically you almost certainly will not.

I’m no longer afraid of second hand cigarette smoke in the least. And a main reason is that I’m not a cat, which seems to be the animal it actually affects the most, by far.


10 posted on 04/13/2022 7:28:28 AM PDT by cuban leaf (My prediction: Harris is Spiro Agnew. We'll soon see who becomes Gerald Ford, and our next prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

My mother died of lung cancer 15 years after she quit smoking. They used to say 5 years after you quit, you are in the clear. Not so.


11 posted on 04/13/2022 7:34:37 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Your post seems to re-enforce the idea that it might be genetics.

BTW, there is a guy in my area that is constantly rolling his own cigarettes and chain smoking them as we all “shoot the bull” in his shop and carriage house (He owns a lot of restored classic cars). He’s in his early 70’s and doesn’t have cancer. However, his skin is like a wrinkled catcher’s mitt, his voice is clearly affected by all that smoking, and I have little doubt there is a reason he has little energy. I’m 68 and you’d think I was 20 years younger.

I long ago stopped seeing “lung cancer” as the only reason for avoiding smoking.

That sais, once or twice a year I’ll smoke a cigar. But I don’t inhale. So I only have to worry about mouth cancer. So I’ve got that going for me. Which is nice.🤣


12 posted on 04/13/2022 7:34:37 AM PDT by cuban leaf (My prediction: Harris is Spiro Agnew. We'll soon see who becomes Gerald Ford, and our next prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Ironically, everyone in my family who quit smoking ended up getting cancer and dying early. Not necessarily lung cancer but cancers related to smoking. Those who didn’t quit lived much longer lives albeit with respiratory problems layer in life but not cancer. I still smoke and hopefully won’t get cancer from it but I guess time will tell.


13 posted on 04/13/2022 7:43:08 AM PDT by TermLimits4All (We all know the solution to preserve freedom. Who though has the will to fight for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

IMHO*, the only way to truly quit smoking is to just quit. Cold turkey. Yes, the first one or two weeks will likely be a living hell as your body adjusts to not having nicotine. But after the initial withdrawal pangs, you should have smooth sailing. The trick is to not backslide.

*Smoked 2, 3 or 4 packs a day for 60+ years. Tried quitting numerous times by using pills, nicotine gum, even hypnosis. Finally quit for good cold turkey in Feb, 1999 along with drugs and alcohol. Have COPD, which is slowly getting worse and will probably kill me eventually. I still want a cigarette or a drink or a snort every day.


14 posted on 04/13/2022 8:02:22 AM PDT by upchuck (The longer I remain unjabbed with the clot-shot, the more evidence I see supporting my decision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

My little brother

3 packs a day

Heart ischemia

Lungs clear

He had an MRI last month he was terrified

He got lucky

Not even a few clouds or spots


15 posted on 04/13/2022 8:04:31 AM PDT by wardaddy (Faulkner never knew Free Republic but he coined its nickname...The Sound and The Fury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
"However, his skin is like a wrinkled catcher’s mitt, his voice is clearly affected by all that smoking..."

I saw a program several years ago that showed how smoking, and the chemicals in cigarettes effects teeth, skin, capillaries, etc. They used twins as examples for comparison between the twins that smoked, and the others, that didn't. The visual differences were remarkable.

Even though I never smoked, I'm far from healthy. I've had health problems that no one else in my family was ever diagnosed with. I had 4 abdominal surgeries between 2010 and 2015, and I'm diabetic, which I take oral medication for. The surgery in 2015 was to have my gall bladder out. My mother's mother died on the operating table having her gall bladder removed in 1946...8 months before I was born. Even my two sons have had health issues that no one else in our family had. My oldest son had to have his appendix out when he was 12, and he was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis over 20 years ago. My youngest son had surgery back in 2019 for cancerous polyps. He was 48 at the time.

16 posted on 04/13/2022 8:15:15 AM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Been A Friend of Bills for 52 years, 11 months and 14 days one day at a time


17 posted on 04/13/2022 8:23:35 AM PDT by small business owner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Great bit of research and we expect the main finding - some people have DNA that functions in a superior fashion in repairing DNA from mutations. That finding will prove applicable to all sorts of diseases, not just cancer.

I would bet that people with greater DNA repair functions also have better immune systems and fight off viruses and bacteria on a better than average basis.


18 posted on 04/13/2022 8:57:55 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

I grew up in a household of two parents that smoked all the time. My mom was a chain smoker and my dad smoked mostly cigars. Most of my siblings and I as well began smoking in our teens but quit smoking by our late thirties or forties. You’d expect chronic lung issues to be seen across most of my parents children. But there is none.

My parents also did not have any chronic lung issues, but both had lives shortened by heart disease and hypertension.


19 posted on 04/13/2022 9:03:01 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

3packs a day in year 2022 has to be expensive.
I would guess the average pack of smokes is at least $10. ea.
$10 x 3 +($6. total taxes) = $36. per day.
$36 per diem x 7 weekdays = $252. per week
$252. per week x 4 mnthy = $1008. per MONTH!!!

I only smoke a little now, maybe 3 or 4 ‘sticks’ a day.


20 posted on 04/13/2022 9:21:32 AM PDT by lee martell (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson