Just out of curiosity, given that the laptop data has been sliced, diced, shredded and shared so much, is any of it now truly verifiable and submissible in court?
I’m no expert, but I think there’s a chain of custody problem. I’ve had the same question.
If you have emails on Hunter's laptop, you can check the recipient's computers or business servers and confirm that they were sent and received. The evidence of criminality on the laptop can be confirmed independently of the laptop. That's exactly what the NY Post did, and the NY Times, Washington Post and every other liberal outlet refused to do.
Finding a US law enforcement agency willing to do that is the problem. There is likely much evidence of their own criminality tied into all Hunter's business dealings and the cover up.
The videos of Hunter with underage prostitutes can be confirmed as genuine, but that's more of a problem for Hunter than Joe.