Various cancers were included, but breast and melanoma cancers were called out in the write up.
I wish they had done a comparative between actual fasting and the fast mimicking diet.
Lettuce and celery?
Why not full fast?
I usually forget to eat, not interested in food and a lousy cook. Weigh 115 now, can’t gain because I don’t eat much. My friends “hate” me. LOL
Anyway, I don’t think I’m in danger of cancer, the good Lord willing, and a fair sea. Have had skin cancer though, due to a childhood spent in the sun with no suntan lotion.
BOOKbump
I watched a documentary on netflix called the science of fasting. The research was so old most of it had been done in the old soviet union but it clearly showed that fasting for 4 days before chemotherapy results in only tumor cells still looking for and absorbing sugar. Since sugar is the carrying agent in most chemotherapy drugs the cancer cells lap up the chemo with the sugar. The bodies own normal cells are perfectly capable of dealing with short duration starvation diet but the cancer cells are not. Funny how these obvious effects are still not known in this country. Might it have something to do with not being able to charge someone for not eating before chemotherapy.
"The real point of a fasting mimicking diet is to experience both autophagy and apoptosis. Both require that you cut your protein to somewhere in the range of 16 grams per day (or even less). Apoptosis is programmed cell death –– in this case the deaths of senescent cells. Around two or three days into a fast, there’s evidence that your body runs out of cellular debris, so it starts eating its own cells. ... It appears to kick in two or three days after the start of autophagy."
I'll leave it to the diligent to search out the benefits or autophagy,