Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jan_Sobieski

Since this mostly affects the old and the fat, any data showing unvaccinated doing better would need to show the age and BMI breakdown of both groups.


15 posted on 04/07/2022 7:19:00 PM PDT by bhl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bhl

I agree with you for a small sample size but when dealing with a large sample, I think that those things (age and BMI) would tend to average out.

Here is a similar thing for Ontario as New Zealand... https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data

Scroll down to this section (near the top) “COVID-19 cases by vaccination status”.

The entry for today says that this...
- Not fully vaccinated 13.89 per 100,000
- Fully vaccinated 16.64 per 100,000
- Fully vaccinated with booster 24.28 per 100,000

If you read the full site, you’ll find that ‘Not fully vaccinated’ is essentially synonymous with ‘Not vaccinated’.... they changed the description a few weeks ago.

Regardless, what this means is that it is fair to compare the first category (not fully vaccinated) with the sum of the other two to say that “folks who are fully vaccinated including those who have had boosters are 2.96 x as likely to be a covid case as those who are unvaccinated.”


16 posted on 04/07/2022 8:52:35 PM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson