Replies

Pardon my musings, but these people fascinate me. I remain amazed that people like Sussman, Comey, Brennan thought they could get away with their brazen criminality. HRC doesn’t fascinate me. She’s just a psychopath who would easily kill me for something as insignificant as my seat on a plane. I know that there are people who have poor character and, when faced with a moral dilemma, will sometimes make choices that come back to haunt them. But these people were so blinded by … power? … wealth? … ideology? …fear (of Hilary)? … that they sacrificed their lives and, by extension, their families’ lives, for a creature as vile as Hilary Clinton.

The nature of my work has exposed me to a lot of teenagers through the years and I’ve seen the evolution of their thinking from “gotta have the latest fashion/gadget” to “I don’t care about ‘things’; I want experiences.” I’ve also sadly noted their increasing inability or lack of interest in doing long-term planning or to contemplate how their actions today will affect them tomorrow.

The criminals involved in the coup seem to have the same affliction but they’re much older. They committed acts that will land them in jail or worse, cost them their (initially) hard-earned careers, ruined their reputations, deprived them of the ability to earn a living and take care of their families, and forever created a stain on their names in history, and all for someone as unworthy of sacrificing yourself for as HRC. I’d like to ask each of them “Please help me understand why you’d do such a thing to yourself?”

They all remind me of the unfortunate set of circumstances that brought together people like Leopold/Loeb and Karla Homolka/Paul Bernardo. These were sick people who still may have gone on to live unremarkable lives with a different partner but, after meeting, committed unspeakable crimes together. SMH

...these people fascinate me. I remain amazed that people like Sussman, Comey, Brennan thought they could get away with their brazen criminality.

They thought they could because they always have. They had gotten to the point of not going to much effort to hide it. They severely underestimated DJT.

Now they are in so deep they have no choice but to double and triple down. They know the penalty for treason and sedition.

The criminals involved in the coup seem to have the same affliction but they’re much older. They committed acts that will land them in jail or worse, cost them their (initially) hard-earned careers, ruined their reputations, deprived them of the ability to earn a living and take care of their families, and forever created a stain on their names in history, and all for someone as unworthy of sacrificing yourself for as HRC. I’d like to ask each of them “Please help me understand why you’d do such a thing to yourself?”
```````
These people worship/serve satan/lucifer. They do not think like you think. They do not have the same values that you have. They do not have the same goals that you have. Their actual intentions are hidden (occult).

asked, "these people were so blinded by … power? … wealth? … ideology? …fear (of Hilary)?"

If you want to understand their motive of their utopia. Look into Jim Jones (KoolAid man.)
Jim Jones used to preach out of his garage in Palo Alto CA. Feinstein, Pelosi, Jerry Brown, Jane Fonda, Harvey Milk and Jim Jones all hang in Palo Alto where Jim Jones lived.
"I was constructed in a garage in Palo Alto" - Hillary Clinton said during a campaign speech 2015.

Jim Jones was the reason for the big switch from the party of the Klan to the party of pity. His father was a Klansman which Jones tried to show him a better way.

Jim Jones was running a number of criminal actions using Blacks in the elections around San Francisco. Look up at Wikipedia which isn't bad in this case (last I checked) "Peoples Temple in San Francisco" Pelosi got her start from him.

Jim Jones was a hard core atheists that coined the phrase "Sky god" and was a hard core communist.
He had communal living of blacks with them handing over they SS checks.

He would also call blacks "Negro" and he was one of the first to use the new meaning of the term "social justice" as we know it today.

example of the new meaning of Social Justice:
Drinking fountains was place to socialize which is why some cultures where not allowed near it. Today they call it "safe spaces" which has exactly the same affect. During days of slavery the slavers recognized they where doing when they called a necessary evil. They had to justify their actions. Today they believe racial superiority is an absolute. They don't even think about it

Rather then telling blacks they're bad because of the color of their skin. They told them they're suppressed based on the color of their skin. It's worse because it assumes without saying so they're inferior based on the color of their skin. In order to recognize racism he taught that you should look at everything including objects based on skin color. Which is why milk is racists. That concept came from Jim Jones.

Jones said, "nothing can prevent me from building this new holy, equitable, egalitarian, socialist order of people’s democracy"

While drinking the Koolaid and injections. Jones said, "this medicine will not work unless everyone takes it."
Notice their version of democracy is a Utopian communism.