[rx]

If one is ever successful enough to get traction on election fraud, you've doubtless noted the Left has pre-greased their demand that sufficient proof of individual fraudulent votes be presented to show that an alleged fraud sufficiently manifested to overturn the "winning" margin, otherwise their position is that only a certain, grand, satisfactory level of fraud vitiates a certified count, else
YOU AIN'T GOT BUPKIS!

[Uber-Eng]

Sometimes it appears to be more about “Q”-ing up the people that gather to look into the fraud. That’s why Trump can still draw people to rallies a year and a half after “losing”.