Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did Hunter Biden Have DOD Encryption Keys On His Laptop?
AND Magazine ^ | 27 Mar, 2022 | Sam Faddis

Posted on 03/29/2022 5:11:22 AM PDT by MtnClimber

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: markomalley

I’m obviously talking about encryption keys - not security certificates. They are different things. There have been problems with secure encryption systems. Guess we will have to see what comes up.


61 posted on 03/29/2022 8:53:24 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1
I’m obviously talking about encryption keys - not security certificates.

The article was talking about root certificates:

The keys are known more formally as “root encryption certificates." Some of them appear to have unusually long expiration dates with many lasting twenty years or more. Such keys should not be present on a personal laptop of any kind, and there is no known reason that Hunter Biden would be in possession of them at all.

They are different things.

In terms of PKI, not so much. The root certificates (along with the corresponding certificate revocation list or CRL) provides a chain of trust that assure that an individual host's certificate is valid. (For example, a user for secure email or a website) The host's certificate acts as a public key that, in conjunction with your private key, allows for secure communications. Specifically, an asymmetric link is initially established using these public/private key pairings during which an session symmetric key is passed on that expires at the conclusion of the individual session. (Basic TLS protocol)

There have been problems with secure encryption systems.

Sure. AES-256 is considered the defacto standard for civilian communications, but with the advent of quantum computing, I would think they should probably go to 2048 bit encryption or higher all around. But I doubt that governments would support that as it makes it more difficult for our betters to snoop on our communications. But that only protects data in motion. Considering the crap state of data center protection, there is minimal issue with getting into an enclave and extracting data when it is at rest.

Guess we will have to see what comes up.

Yup. All I'm saying is that this appears to be a shiny object to distract and discredit people wishing to expose the real dangers of what's on the Crackhead's laptop in order to protect the Big Guy.

62 posted on 03/29/2022 10:42:44 PM PDT by markomalley (Directive 10-289 is in force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson