Interesting. Not comforting.
I expect we will soon see some changes to the definitions of GMO to get around what appears to be one of the more substantial challenges to this approach.
In passing, I note the transgenic peas. Then I thought about the various meat substitutes utilizing pea protein. Another reason to avoid that stuff.
Still: they can change the plant. Some plants can transmit the antigens. Some immune response (would that manifest as a food allergy??) occurs.
I only hope there continues to be resistance to this delivery system. I doubt the pharms will simply release this into the ecosystem. They will want to be compensated and so the stuff will cost more and be identified.
For now. Who knows how desperate they are to change us all?
Thanx for the link. While I crave information, in this instance I almost wish to go back to ignorance.
You’re welcome. Thank-you for reading the link, not many have. Yes, agreed ignorance can be bliss and I am often conflicted by my need to know and then knowing and wishing I didn’t. Early 2020 there was a small group of us on FB trying to figure out where this technology is leading. There is the decades long transhuman agenda, which I believe is part. Currently meds are required to keep the body from rejecting anything foreign. For all the wearables emerging, electronic/Ai/robotic parts et al you would have to alter humans. To link up to the Quantum computer with something like neuro-link would also require changes. Currently crispr can remove strands of DNA but they are working on synthetic DNA to replace it. It was also suggested in the group that the goal is to make us ‘docile and disease resistant’ such as they did with cattle. I suspect it is both and more. Depending on the creator of said technologies, the ideas are endless.