[Tell It Right]

The article was talking about the U.S. attacking nations only in North America -- that trying to conquer nations outside of North America isn't the norm. You deliberately left off the North America part of the quote, much like the Dim media when they take things out of context, and proceeded to list a bunch of other nations outside North America that the U.S. has attacked. I brought back in the full context of the article and corrected your list of nations accordingly.

Is it really that hard to get? I'm just trying to make sure us FReepers argue our points with legitimate facts. We are on the right side of things, but we lose the argument when we argue with lies.

[fireman15]

The article vanity was talking about the U.S. attacking nations only in North America

This "vanity" started with a misleading premise and contained "Clintonian" style qualifiers which were intended to lead the reader toward a desired conclusion. It was not unlike a push poll where you get called on the phone and the real goal is to change your opinion and not record it. I do not object "vanities" being used to start threads and I do not disagree with many of the points that JewishRighter made. But I do not believe that the conversation should be limited by the game rules that you believe were set by the author.