Say what?
Bro, what are you even TALKING about.
Pro-tip: The 'collective unconscious of humans' is not data, nor can it be recorded.
I didn't say that. There are many many sources for the message. Further, the message Clif puts out is NOT because of some mythical "insider" like those other morons like Charlie Ward. The message/data comes from the data acquired from the collective unconscious of humans. All it is in the end is linguistic analysis that I think taps into the homo sapien morphogenetic field. Clif does his level best to interpret said data. He always admits when he's interpreted incorrectly, unlike some folks (cough**Scott Adams**cough). Besides that he's a walking encyclopedia and true scholar that I believe has unique insight on this war.
Say what?
Bro, what are you even TALKING about.
Pro-tip: The 'collective unconscious of humans' is not data, nor can it be recorded.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/18/22 Vol.398, Q Day 1603 <blockquote>, numberonepal wrote: |
| Cliff High is not the sole source of 'the message,' I reckon. I didn't say that. There are many many sources for the message. Further, the message Clif puts out is NOT because of some mythical "insider" like those other morons like Charlie Ward. The message/data comes from the data acquired from the collective unconscious of humans. All it is in the end is linguistic analysis that I think taps into the homo sapien morphogenetic field. Clif does his level best to interpret said data. He always admits when he's interpreted incorrectly, unlike some folks (cough**Scott Adams**cough). Besides that he's a walking encyclopedia and true scholar that I believe has unique insight on this war. |
*
I reject Clif High, along with Charlie Ward, for dispensing 'received wisdom' and do not believe High is tapped in to a 'homo sapien morphogenetic field'. He's not dealing with data - but he has deceived many into believing he is on an elevated plane of consciousness. Like Ward, Clif is selling hot air and self-importance.
Since I don't share your opinion of him, I don't see the point in your lashing peers for objections to content that violates FR's family friendly policies. I agree with Gasshog that Clif's vulgarity detracted from whatever opinion he wanted to express. I believe that's all Clif shares, his opinion, and therefore his content should be treated like an opinion and subject to the board's content policies and not like ethereal pearls of collective unconscios dressed up as 'data'.
Said another way, had believed that there was such a thing as a 'homo sapien morphogenetic field', I would not want Clif to be the one who 'taps into it' and then relays it to the general public via sex toy metaphors/analogies. There are far too many superior minds with advanced communication skills available.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/18/22 Vol.398, Q Day 1603 <blockquote>, numberonepal wrote: |
| Cliff High is not the sole source of 'the message,' I reckon. I didn't say that. There are many many sources for the message. |
*
I didn't understsand this part. Gasshog objected to the vulgar content distracting from the message and you said "then you won't get the message." I am sorry I misunderstood you to mean that if he didn't endorse High's content as is, he wouldn't receive the message. I am now curious to know what you really meant.