Your analysis is spot on.
I was a huge Tucker fan, on just about every issue he was the most insightful.
On this issue, I’m sorry to say Tucker has been so one sided as to be dishonest. This congresswoman was the first time he put on an opposing voice to debate.
If you watch Hannity, he’s the exact opposite approach.
Laura Ingram seems to be closer to Tucker.
I see a lot of false premises all the time. Laura tonight was arguing that we are somehow preventing a peace agreement by providing equipment to Ukraine.
She also referred to us putting “bodies” into Ukraine, which no one is suggesting.
If you watch Hannity, he puts on former Trump officials. I trust their analysis.
May your city be the first hit with nuclear bomb
So we don’t have to listen to you apologize for being so wrong.
Here comes Victoria Nuland’s *itch again.
Tucker has an open invite to anyone to come on his show so you’re wrong there. They just don’t want to.
She was the one interrupting, she was disingenuous (lying) about her amnesty bill, and clearly over her head with regards to the potential for this to spill over into an even bigger conflict. When she uses terms ‘that’s hypothetical’ she proves she’s not thinking through all the ramifications of our actions.
There is a large majority of people on Fox that are pro war in Ukraine, true Tucker doesn’t have many people on that disagree with him, if you want to listen to opposing views, look at the rest of the network for that, he’s under no obligation to offer opposing views.
The other reason he doesn’t have opposing views on his shows is most people don’t want to come on the most popular show on cable news and get humiliated.
I don’t think it’s a false premise at all to say providing arms to Ukraine is preventing a peace agreement.
There are ongoing peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine being facilitated by Turkey and Israel, the USA has no public part of the negotiations, all we keep talking about escalating the situation thru a no-fly zone, if the no-fly zone goes ahead, forget about any peace agreement.
From that perspective what we are doing would prevent a peace agreement.