Posted on 02/24/2022 6:31:49 PM PST by ransomnote
PING
His whole point is that this has been a pandemic of PCR testing.
The medical establishment has reached equivalency with the mainstream media with regard to credibility. The question of how to use their assertions in order to discern what’s really true is also the same as with the media:
Take the information they give and then find either the direct opposite or whatever’s most widely separated from it.
The World Health Organization (WHO) denounced the PCR test 01-20-21 (Bad Orange Man gone).
Rope and a tall tree
wow, for me this one is a hot mess.
basically, if i read this right (and it’s poorly written for sure because i initially got the impression from the title that it’s proposing that PCR “doesn’t work” which is nonsense, of course), i think it may be saying Drosten doesn’t know how to do PCR, which is entirely possible. the CDC didn’t know how to either, releasing a test that flat out didn’t work, i.e. didn’t implement a valid PCR process, as verified by our medical school and virology labs back in early 2020. it forced our lab and medical school to sequence the virus and develop it’s own “home grown” PCR test, in house.
anyway, the virology lab my relation works in uses PCR correctly for what it was meant to be used for; that is, to amplify specific genetic material. if it’s there, PCR will find it/amplify it and only it. that’s it. that’s all that PCR can do and that is solely what it was designed to do. it doesn’t tell you how it got there. or exactly how much was there. it can give you a quantitative estimate, with RT PCR, but it’s not exact and can’t be taken as such and is useless as many here have pointed out if too many cycles are used.
as such it’s used as a only screening test. other confirmatory tests have to be deployed, examinations, judgement, etc. etc., for an MD to sign off on any diagnosis.
but, for what it does, and if properly engineered as a test, PCR works very well.
I always believed the primary reason for these tests was to harvest DNA data.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled The PCR Scam: PCR Does Not Detect SARS-CoV-2., dadfly wrote: |
wow, for me this one is a hot mess. basically, if i read this right (and it’s poorly written for sure because i initially got the impression from the title that it’s proposing that PCR “doesn’t work” which is nonsense, of course), i think it may be saying Drosten doesn’t know how to do PCR, which is entirely possible. the CDC didn’t know how to either, releasing a test that flat out didn’t work, i.e. didn’t implement a valid PCR process, as verified by our medical school and virology labs back in early 2020. it forced our lab and medical school to sequence the virus and develop it’s own “home grown” PCR test, in house. anyway, the virology lab my relation works in uses PCR correctly for what it was meant to be used for; that is, to amplify specific genetic material. if it’s there, PCR will find it/amplify it and only it. that’s it. that’s all that PCR can do and that is solely what it was designed to do. it doesn’t tell you how it got there. or exactly how much was there. it can give you a quantitative estimate, with RT PCR, but it’s not exact and can’t be taken as such and is useless as many here have pointed out if too many cycles are used. as such it’s used as a only screening test. other confirmatory tests have to be deployed, examinations, judgement, etc. etc., for an MD to sign off on any diagnosis. but, for what it does, and if properly engineered as a test, PCR works very well. |
*
The PCR does not work as a diagnostic test, it cannot diagnose the presence of disease.
The inventor of the PCR said that it cannot be used to diagnose any disease. He said it was a laboratory tool. Basically the PCR detects small amounts of material in a sample that would otherwise be missed and exaggerates the amount present to give researchers a chance to find otherwise overlooked material.
So if someone was exposed to a virus, a month ago but the body defeated it, there may still be fragments of the virus left that the PCR would essentially concentrate. Not knowing viral load is a 'hot mess'. Even fragments of unrelated viruses can be the reason why the useless Covid PCR tests positive.
The CDC knowingly used too many cycles to detect much more than debris of unknown sources. The PCR tested Paw Paw, Coca Cola and Kiwi positive for Covid.
Dr. Michael Yeadon, formerly a Chief of Science officer at Pfizer said the PCR has greater than 90% false positives and an unknown number of false negatives. Our enemies intentionally used a test that can't work in order to control the narrative, which worked.
There is no isolated sample of Covid virus to use as a reference. The PCR, which cannot diagnose disease was based off of standard coronaviruses as a result. Even the CDC admits it did not base the PCR on Covid.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled The PCR Scam: PCR Does Not Detect SARS-CoV-2., MayflowerMadam wrote: |
I always believed the primary reason for these tests was to harvest DNA data. |
*
I think it's multipurpose and you have posted the one purpose I find most disturbing.
ok, i guess we disagree to some extent. to inform others on what i believe i know about PCR, i’ll make one more post, hopefully to clarify to others.
it is a screening test, and it works as that. it does eliminate the presence of specific sequences in a sample.
in the context of multiple PCR tests (reflex tests are ordered automatically on positive) or other confirmatory tests, you can be sure what you’re looking for is absent.
in the context of multiple PCR tests correctly collected, you can and should trust the result for an active infection only. long term, PCR has no value. the creation of that sample is entirely a different matter. all kinds of things can go wrong at the collection stage.
we do, i think, agree that alone, it doesn’t “diagnose” anything. that is done in conjunction with further confirmatory tests and finally by the judgement of an MD. when it’s used standalone as it has been by the CDC during this sad episode to infer a diagnosis, it is medical fraud.
if you are saying anything else than that. i.e., any blanket statement that PCR can’t be used as a “test” under any circumstances to help diagnose disease or even that it’s not a valid method or some such nonsense. you’re dead wrong and possibly misleading people about PCR, which is why i felt the need to comment.
it’s used everyday at the medical school for research to **test** basic research hypotheses by determining the absence of predicted analytes or genetic material during experimentation, and it’s used everyday in the lab as one of a battery of 100’s of ***tests*** ordered by doctors all over the area not to just investigate the ccp virus, but for many other scientific purposes, among them to diagnose illness.
with that have the last word if you want. i’ve made my point and hopefully clarified.
“I think it’s multipurpose and you have posted the one purpose I find most disturbing.”
*************************************************
I have it on good authority that, using the PCR test, they have harvested my DNA as part of a campaign to create tens of thousands of highly intelligent, handsome super soldiers.
I’m putting this on the internet so it must be true!🙀
Duh! I knew that 2 years ago.
P
And still, as regards the original coding of the RT-PCR test done in Berlin, Germany, in January 2020 using Chinese-supplied data which later could not be confirmed, one notes the time line. First an RT-PCR is coded by Drosten, a month later that test is accepted by the EU, and a month later the WHO declares an official "pandemic" complete with taxonomy to include "presumed" and "assumed" deaths, and predicts a 3.4% death rate while urging "test, test, test."
As of 25 February 2022, more than two years AFTER the coding of the RT-PCR supported by the Corman-Drosten "paper," and ALMOST two years since the forecast of millions dead in the first months of the pandemic, "official" data from "official" source tells a far different story.
Source: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/
Source: https://www.census.gov/popclock/world
( 5,928,622 "global deaths" / 7,880,001, 022 "global population" ) x 100 = 0.075 % mortality rate over twenty-six months.
The PCR-driven "pandemic" has been survived by 99.925 % of the global population.
That PCR tests are ordered by physicians is no proof that they are efficacious, but that the tests are ordered in the context of the "pandemic" demonstrates that the WHO's push to "test, test, test" from March of 2020 using an RT-PCR coded two months earlier suggests the Drosten was useful. But not in detecting the actual fatality rate of the virus, nor indeed could make a distinction between the now-infamous "from" as opposed to "with."
LOL. FAKE NEWS. It’s been isolated and purified, regardless of what Christine Massey claims, with her childish Freedom of Information requests written so as to elicit a negative response to government agencies she sent it to.
Even Steve Kirsch who has latched onto some zany ideas himself, recognized the fraud perpetrated by some who claim that SARS-CoV-2 was not isolated snd purified. Massey was such a coward that she would not debate him live regarding the subject.
The scariest interview I’ve seen on this whole plan is from a pretty serious lawyer with military whistleblowers:
https://www.trunews.com/stream/todd-callender-genetic-altering-vaccines-could-nullify-human-rights
biden proved the kung flu is a scam when he opened our southern border and spread over 2,000,000 nondocumented unvaccinated invaders across our country during a supposed “global pandemic” while the cdc and the world health organization silently sit back and watch...
So if someone was exposed to a virus, a month ago but the body defeated it, there may still be fragments of the virus left that the PCR would essentially concentrate. Not knowing viral load is a 'hot mess'. Even fragments of unrelated viruses can be the reason why the useless Covid PCR tests positive.
FWIW, it's also easy to "trick" the PCR Test to reporting a negative result.
GF had Omicron. She'd been recovered for more than 3 weeks when she tested "negative" again prior to going to Canada for a ski trip. She panicked.
I told her exactly what happened as described above, the test she was required to take prior to entering Canada had picked up dead fragments of the virus still in her upper nose.
The 'fix' was to spray Afrin into her nose 3 times over a 24 hour period and to flush her knows every 4 hours with Xynase and re-test.
Prior to re-testing, spray with Xynase again, followed by Afrin right before taking the test.
Tested negative, went to Canada for her ski trip.
Knowing there was a high risk that many in her skiing group of 30 that a significant number of them would be "random tested" upon entry into Canada, I told her to repeat spraying her nose on the plane.
Sure enough, half the group was pulled aside for "random" testing. She tested negative in Canada. Seven others tested "positive."
They were all allowed to enter Canada and instructed to self quarantine. They'd be notified via an app when they were "safe" to continue their trip. There was ZERO follow-up by anyone. They all continued their ski trip with NO ONE following them, monitoring them, etc..
What a joke these PCR tests have been from the beginning. Same for the rules to enter Canada.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.