Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cecily

1) The dog shouldn’t be biting head and face.

2) The dog did not respond to the officer’s commands to let go and return to his side. He had to pull the dog off.

3) The officer claims he was delayed in pulling the dog off because he had no cover officer, but that cover officer was there, his body cam filmed the incident.

This badly trained dog is still working.

The lawsuit also claims that the officer did not warn the suspect that he was going to set the dog on her, as required by law.


66 posted on 02/23/2022 6:15:28 PM PST by heartwood (Someone has to play devil's advocate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: heartwood

If what you say is true, that puts a different light on things, but ONLY if all your points are actually true.


76 posted on 02/23/2022 7:00:50 PM PST by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson