Yeeeee Haaaaw
Posted on 02/23/2022 1:21:45 PM PST by DallasBiff
A West Texas woman running to be the state's railroad commissioner has turned heads after she posted a TikTok of herself topless and without pants while straddling an oil pumping jack.
Sarah Stogner, 37, tweeted out the controversial video, set to The Sugarhill Gang's Apache (Jump On It) song, on February 13, writing: 'They said I needed money. I have other assets.'
The video - which has now been viewed more than 104,800 times - was apparently meant to garner attention for Stogner's campaign, as she trailed frontrunner Wayne Christian, the incumbent who currently has $766,256 on hand as voters head to the polls, according to Transparency USA, a website that tracks campaign funding.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Yeeeee Haaaaw
Topless? Look again!
Truth. I think we’re done with the Bush’s for a bit. I’m still pissed at Dubbya for creating the American version of the Gestapo with his DHS abomination. Moving the BATFE under the DoJ and out of the IRS was about as unConstitutional and illegal as Slick Willy giving the Chinese rocket technology and MFN status.
Not guilty.
Meh. She's all hat and no...cattle.
I grew up believing the BS that it was men who had the midlife crisis.
GoF***Me would get her money. But GFM is biased on Republicans and Truckers. Let’s see how they would treat this ho’s advertisement!
butter face
The first member of the Silicone Party?
Better than Slim Pickens version, that’s for sure.
I’ll take her off your hands...
don’t give Hillary ideas!
Being from Texas, she is right about the issues within the Railroad Commissioners Office!
There is way too much backroom deal-making corruption and not enough forward thinking!
As far as her publicity stunt, to be honest I had not even heard of her until now! But reading her positions, I might be inclined to vote for her come March 1st.
Great Role Model for our daughters and Granddaughters. /s
Another politician who lacks morals. Just what we need.
She’s got my vote.
We can know that she has a couple of points to make, and we can certainly see her position on things.
George P. Bush,…..
What exactly is that for a name? Does not sound socially acceptable.
Meh...wasn’t necessarily worth the look but not a vomit inducer either.
That’s not top less. The laws are very specific.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.