Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGurl24

You did not simply disagree, you attacked attempting to mock and using a logical fallacy.

When you decide to return to a normal tone I will do likewise.

So yes either you are a lib or a sophist, but you left sophist out because you continue to be dishonest in this debate.

I presented either option, try arguing in good faith instead.


66 posted on 02/22/2022 1:01:52 PM PST by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: All
You did not simply disagree, you attacked attempting to mock and using a logical fallacy. When you decide to return to a normal tone I will do likewise. So yes either you are a lib or a sophist, but you left sophist out because you continue to be dishonest in this debate. I presented either option, try arguing in good faith instead.

Incorrect. You started with a conspiracy theory. You had a narrative, and you twisted the facts to fit a narrative without support. That's the logical fallacy. Then you got angry because I pointed that out.

Far too many people are embracing conspiracy narratives and outright lies, because they are angry at the world around them.

I share in the anger, but retreating to insane conspiracy is not the solution.

By the way, I count 4 separate formal fallacies in your posts, let's see if you can figure out which ones those are. When you do that, then perhaps we can have a back and forth? Until then... I'll just leave you to your theories. :)

73 posted on 02/22/2022 1:44:09 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson