Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/18/2022 10:34:14 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: semimojo

I guess it was just a coincidence that I took ivermectin and my covid went away in a few days. Probably had no effect. Just a coincidence.


2 posted on 02/18/2022 10:36:28 AM PST by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.

I guess they didn’t talk to the people that I know that took it and felt fantastic by the 3rd morning.

Or talk to any of the doctors that have been proscribing it all over the country.

Or the older guy at my gym that came down with The Rona, went on Ivermectin and was fine in a few days. And said that he hasn’t felt that good in a long time.


3 posted on 02/18/2022 10:36:41 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

Yea, I guess we have to ignore the real-life evidence of complete success in Indonesia and the states of India, right?

And the additional complete success shown by doctors all over the globe treating their patients with protocols that include Ivermectin?


4 posted on 02/18/2022 10:37:48 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

It is probably impossible to know whether or not ivermectin and/or HCQ help battle Covid without doing laboratory experiments. In other words, place the Covid 19 virus in a petri dish (or whatever) and add ivermectin. See if it harms the virus at all. If it does, then it works. If not, it probably does not. Do the same with HCQ.

There is no realistic way of knowing whether or not any particular medication works on anyone’s body. Folks who were sick for three days with ivermectin might have still been sick three days without it.


7 posted on 02/18/2022 10:43:21 AM PST by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

Fortunately we have access to information outside Fauci’s control which proves Ivermectin is fantastic in treating Covid. Many treatment protocols in use since the beginning cut the risk of hospitalization and death among the most vulnerable elderly patients with comorbidities by 85%, and much better among those not high risk. Many FReepers report wild success with Ivermectin. Dr. McCullough, Dr. Mercola, Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Kory and others all report outstanding success, as do websites like https://ivmmeta.com/
which provides analysis of 78 Ivermectin studies.

MOre great evidence available in many other places, like this website set up by physicians Dr. McCullough, Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Reisch and many others:
https://earlycovidcare.org/review-the-evidence/

The vilification of Ivermectin by those waging medical warfare against us will be a feature of Nuremberg Trials 2.0.


8 posted on 02/18/2022 10:43:45 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

Does it say what Standard of Care is? Did it include remdesivir? What day did treatment start with Ivermectin? Was dose high enough? Comorbidities?


9 posted on 02/18/2022 10:44:51 AM PST by dkGba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

Now, do the combination of FDA and TGA approved Ivermectin, Zinc and Doxycycline.


13 posted on 02/18/2022 10:52:03 AM PST by jacknhoo ( Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo
I just went back to a compilation od studies for various Covid treatments that someone posted here a while back. The studies were of "all-stage" treatment, "early" treatment, and overall mortality reduction. Here is how Ivermectin fared and Remdesivir fared (the percentages reflect cases in which the drugs were found to be effective):

Ivermectin: 64%, 63%, and 54%

Remdesivir: 20%, 76%, and 19%

The Ivermectin studies (dozens of them - 78, 32, and 38, respectively) included between 55,000 and 85,000 patients. The sample for Remdesivir was a bit larger.
14 posted on 02/18/2022 10:52:24 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

JAMA contributing to the mistrust of the medical community.

Hard to know how to trust any of them after the BS they have been spewing for two years.


16 posted on 02/18/2022 10:52:42 AM PST by JayAr36 (Just watching the demise of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

A major tenet of science is that any experimental result be reproducible by any and all, including skeptics, for its results to be considered valid.

I’d like to see some objective skeptics on our side perform the same clinical study and see what they come up with.

Seems like that would resolve the question of whether ivermectin is effective or not and get politics out of the equation.

Has any qualified organization on our side performed such a test?


18 posted on 02/18/2022 10:53:56 AM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo
Yet here is a study on the government NIH website that establishes the effectiveness of Ivermectin against Covid

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/

21 posted on 02/18/2022 10:56:12 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

Open label? So it’s purposely NOT blind? Why would they do that? Why would JAMA publish that?


22 posted on 02/18/2022 10:57:00 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

“Meaning: The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.”

Then this study is a LIE!

WHO paid for it?

The Voluminous evidence in the REAL world says that it does work!

Was the purpose of that study to find out if Ivermectin works or was it so they could go ... SEE, SEE!


32 posted on 02/18/2022 11:17:43 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

Malaysia... please


36 posted on 02/18/2022 11:38:05 AM PST by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

These studies are BS. Here’s why:

Ivermectin, HCQ are zinc ionophores. All they do against the virus is transport zinc across the cell membrane so zinc can disrupt viral replication.

Without zinc it they are guns without ammo.

Dr. Ralph Baric published this in 2010
He later 2016 synthesized bat coronaviruses at Wuhan that could infect humans. He also found injected vaccines worthless against it, but monoclonal antibodies effective. He’s also made recommendations needed to create a virus capable of pandemic transmission


43 posted on 02/18/2022 12:10:36 PM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

This study was designed to fail. They only administered Ivermectin, no zinc, etc.


55 posted on 02/18/2022 2:25:49 PM PST by EastTexasTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

Yet another bogus study. Participants were high risk patients only in a hospital setting, they were underdosed and were not given other supplements typically seen in FLCCC, Zelenko, et al, treatment protocols. Shame on the AMA.


58 posted on 02/18/2022 3:35:33 PM PST by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

how much you getting paid for your disinfo. It worked for me and several others here. Sad how dishonest the big pharma has become.


60 posted on 02/18/2022 5:35:56 PM PST by norsky (<P><img src=" "width=450"></img> <P> <a href= > </a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

Hi.

Reading the study, it appears the sample size was 1000 m/f patients.

Did I miss something?

5.56mm


65 posted on 03/08/2022 10:32:39 AM PST by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho need to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo; P-Marlowe; Jane Long

Ivermectin group, 3 deaths.

Control group, 10 deaths.

You’d think they’d mention that.

It was exactly what happened to me. I was sick with covid and have 2 comorbidities. I progressed to very, very sick but refused hospital care.

This typing proves I didn’t die.


73 posted on 03/08/2022 11:47:36 AM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson