How come his pivot is believed but not Vance’s?
I only really liked Vance because he was an outsider and a fresh face.
Mandel has been in office in some form since 2007 !
Anyway, Rand has endorsed Gibbons. I think he’s the sensible choice...
Vance could be a Manchurian Republican but I’d give him 6 years. Same with Masters in Az. If they get 6 then 12 is automatic and they become stale. It’s vigilance. I can’t see Vance believing in the welfare state as a solver of problems-not after reading his book and seeing the flick.