Replies

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled See the CDC corruption for yourself | It's in plain sight in this paper in JAMA about myocarditis rates by CDC authors., Cboldt wrote:

I can't even figure out how VAERS could be overreported since the system should eliminate duplicates unless there is a bug.

VAERS is a cause and effect measurement. Overreporting happens when the cause is not the vaccine.

The CDC has seen to it that VAERS is habitually, and radically under reported.

The CDC did not want this database, but Congress mandated it to give the public a window into potential issues with vaccines, and to give medical establishment an early warning signal, so that if there were unexpected negative impacts following implementation of a new vax, they would know to halt and investigate.

VAERS is intentionally backward, hard to search, and search results are ridiculously limited...by design. They have our tax dollars and lavish it wherever they wish. They have other state of the art databases built for hospital management etc. built after VAERS, but they want VAERS to be as unusable as possible.

Harvard conducted a study on VAERS reporting 10 years ago and at that time discovered only about 1 in 100 actual adverse events were reported to VAERS.

Many doctors don't know what VAERS is, but CDC boilerplate pretends that 'it's the law' for doctors to report adverse events to VAERS. I've posted content about nurses being scolded, punished etc. for trying to report to VAERS. The paper version of a VAERS report is 'full of countless boxes, pages and pages of them, and it takes 45 minutes to fill out'. That's by design as well. How many doctors during a supposed 'pandemic' have UNPAID time, 45 minutes for each patient, to fill that out. The CDC has done what it could to deter compliance.

When the vax rollout happened, a bitchute channel named WelcomeTheEagle88 (e.g., https://www.bitchute.com/video/QnlBRAH9jacL/) used his expertise in medical insurance data analysis, and his advanced analysis software suite, to examine CDC data releases to VAERS with the Covid 'vaccine' rollout. He detected many manipulations and concluded the CDC is withholding data, or delaying its release to forward the spread of the vaccinations without admitting to harm. He is a true geek so many found his walk throughs arcane, but none could refute him on level ground. On FR trolls screamed he was stupid, ignorant, a fear porn monger and crazy. His data and reporting was noticed by Stew Peters and eventually, Dr. McCullough, who spoke positively of his work.

Initially people could report directly to VAERS but the CDC didn't like that (too much exposure) so now all reports go to the CDC and they, according to their literature, have 4-6 weeks to vet reports before publishing. But data analysis indicates many reports to the CDC just don't make it or are held past the point they are irrelevant for an 'early safety signal'.

Comparisons to other databases show this. The military database gives you number of persons + obligation to report ALL medical history to that medical system, so you get a percentage of doses administered to number of reports of harm that is far, far beyond that reported to VAERS. At one point I looked in England's version of VAERS and saw that they had as many adverse events reports and America, but they have 1/5 the population.

VAERS was supposed to be centralized, but the CDC created a separate phone app for those being vaccinated to use to report adverse events, and coincidentally, that application does not report data to VAERS as it should, but is instead stored in a database only the CDC staff can access, denying the Congressional mandate's intention of giving the public ready access to vaccine adverse events reports.

There's two whistleblowers now, working with Thomas Renz, Esq., who say they have seen many many deaths/adverse events post vax sitting in the Medicare database, unreported to VAERS. In fact, there are 12 database systems that are all supposed to automatically roll data over to VAERS; the CMS system is just one such database that hasn't been doing that.

VAERS is definitely under reported. The experts know that the stats like 1% reporting rate or 1/40 reporting ratio are vastly under estimating, but as the experts they are, they do not speculate on the atrocity likely taking place given all the ways this bioweapon has been politicized.

VAERS is not so much a cause and effect measurement, as shrieking trolls routinely scream at me. VAERS has a disclaimer saying it's not cause and effect. It's actually a 'safety signal'. It's what you notice that makes you halt administration of the vax until it's safety can be determined through analysis which determines mechanism(s) of harm.

Normally a vax has a safety board watching for safety signals and a pre-established threshold past which it would be taken off the market. Doctors who study this say around 50 deaths would warrant a black box warning, and around 200 would take any produce off the market. But by the first month or so there were already 1200 deaths, and those as I have said, are just a subset of actual events.

A few mathematicians studied the CDC's algorithm to determine the number of deaths required for the Covid 'vaccine' to be taken off the market. They assure the public that the CDC established a threshold using an algorithm which makes it mathematically impossible to trigger a safety signal. For Covid vaccines alone, literally any number of deaths constitute a vaccine with no safety concerns. This isn't even all the game playing involved, but all I have time for now.