Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

From the artilce: “Before I get into the details, it’s important to understand that she and her sources are highly credible. There have been concerted efforts to discredit her, but her claims as far back as early 2020 have invariably been proven accurate. The powers-that-be attempted to debunk her claims that Covid-19 was developed in a lab. They tried to disprove what she’s said all along, that Peter Daszak and Anthony Fauci had intimate knowledge of the gain-of-function research that was going on in Wuhan. They even tried to prove she was wrong about the inefficacy of the vaccines. All of her claims have been verified and she has been vindicated multiple times.”

From wikipedia:

“Reviewers for MIT Rapid Reviews: COVID-19 (RR:C19), which seeks out preprint papers and reviews them in an attempt to reduce the spread of false or misleading scientific news, analyzed Yan’s study and issued the following statement:

Given the far-reaching implications of the “Yan Report,” RR:C19 sought out peer reviews from world-renowned experts in virology, molecular biology, structural biology, computational biology, vaccine development, and medicine. Collectively, reviewers have debunked the authors’ claims that: (1) bat coronaviruses ZC45 or ZXC21 were used as a background strain to engineer SARS-CoV-2, (2) the presence of restriction sites flanking the RBD suggest prior screening for a virus targeting the human ACE2 receptor, and (3) the furin-like cleavage site is unnatural and provides evidence of engineering. In all three cases, the reviewers provide counter-arguments based on peer-reviewed literature and long-established foundational knowledge that directly refute the claims put forth by Yan et al. There was a general consensus that the study’s claims were better explained by potential political motivations rather than scientific integrity. The peer reviewers arrived at these common opinions independently, further strengthening the credibility of the peer reviews.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan


43 posted on 02/13/2022 4:52:35 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke

Hi Allen.

From wikipedia

BWA HA HA HA.!!!!

You so funny.

/-)


44 posted on 02/13/2022 5:38:20 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke

Entries like that on Wiki are CCP paid influencers efforts to show the CCP in a good light.

This is part of the CCP’s huge worldwide campaign to prove that the CCP’s governance is the best in the world, the Han are superior to all other races, and China is the perfect country to live in (as long as you are Han Chinese).

The CCP under Xi Jinping is, for want of a better term, ‘evil’


57 posted on 02/13/2022 8:01:56 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson