Well, your posting history indicates you are a staunch Russian apologist, so your comments about this matter should be taken with that in mind.
Ah, yes, the Minsk Agreements. The agreements that Russia said it (Russia) was not bound by since it (Russia) was not an involved party in the civil war (yet Russia was the principal behind the agreements). The same agreements that were totally silent on Russia’s annexation of Crimea, thus tacitly accepting Russia’s annexation of Crimea. The same agreements that Russia insists gives the Donbas autonomy (which, of course, would allow Russia to call the shots there and influence Ukrainian policy). Of course Russia likes the agreements, because Russia is the biggest winner in those agreements.
What is wrong with being a “Russian apologist” on things Russia is right at?
Did you read the agreements and then the Ukrainian law on the “interim period”?
Talk that Russia is going to influence Ukrainian politics through Donbas autonomy is just a lame excuse to steal electoral rights from millions of people.
Prove me why I am wrong.