Posted on 02/09/2022 6:37:25 PM PST by Chode
are you FRIGGIN KIDDING ME???
36sec BBC video
BBC admits they use HIV to make the covid vaccine
https://www.bitchute.com/video/a4AJh4Ncw7Q9/
“The current vaccines could very well be using snipits of HIV for their “clamp” as well.”
They could also contain nanocells that are activated by the Musk low orbit satellites via 5G transmissions.
I here that one a person is injected with these they easily spread from person to person. Since they are non-biological, they can be transmitted via animals. They also do not ‘die’ so live forever on surfaces and cannot be deactivated with common disinfectants.
"Today I joined #HIVTestingWeek by getting a quick, easy test for HIV. Viruses don’t discriminate - anyone can get HIV so I’d encourage anyone who hasn’t yet to find out your HIV status to help achieve our goal to end HIV transmission in England by 2030"
SV40 was present in cancers of people who either had or had not received the polio vaccines that were contaminated with SV40.
SV40 has not been present in any vaccine since 1963.
People with cancers who were born after 1963, when SV40 was no longer a contaminant of the polio vaccine, were found to have evidence for SV40 in their cancerous cells.
Epidemiologic studies do not show an increased risk of cancers in those who received polio vaccine between 1955 and 1963.
Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis that SV40 virus contained in polio vaccines administered before 1963 caused cancers.
Obviously Biden should be sending out free HIV test kits.
I thought that BBC had no credibility due to being a state-run propaganda outlet?
He’s not, he always leads. Call it a flyer.
But you are, sure as I’m sitting here. You know it, I know it, and judging by the rest of the comments, a lot of other people do too. Time to change your screenname again.
Yeah.
It may have always been this way, but I have noticed lately the propaganda machine comes up with a polished word or phrase, likely poll tested, then the media machine shovels it out by the truckload.
Then pretty soon some soft headed libtard ambles up to my desk at work talking about how some misinformation was debunked or something.
Misinformation is an interesting term though. It means to me that the information is incorrect, but doesn’t go so far as to say a lie. Because a lie is intentional, and would convey that the spreader is intelligent enough to know that and know what the correct information is.
Misinformation, the way the libs are using it, conveys to me that the information is incorrect and it’s not intentional! These folks are just knuckle dragging imbeciles, and too stupid to know what the correct information even is. We have to take care of them, for their own good. It’s a step toward dehumanization.
Or maybe I’m just reading too much into this.
You consider the word “libtard” a personal attack?
Maybe you’re in the wrong place?
Click-bait site giving out misinformation.
/\
Well maybe you should report it to DHS
Or ARE you DHS ?
Obviously Biden should be sending out free HIV test kits.
That’ll be next.
It’s a BBC video posted on bitchute. So what? It’s also posted on Rumble, Odysee, Yandex, and selections from it are posted on You Tube.
Is it any less a BBC video because it was posted on bitchute?
“Is it any less a BBC video because it was posted on bitchute?”
Your criteria is an excerpt on a click-bait site?
Get real.
When you know you lost, attack the messenger.
When you know you lost, attack the messenger.
/\
Then why did you do that ?
I pointed out the heading of your modeled graph clearly states it’s based on PROJECTED
You lost the debate.
Then you attacked.
Checkmate.
Your digging.
See, the only one you are fooling is yourself, typical libtard believing their own propaganda.
The rest of us can plainly see facts, such as “ PROJECTED”.
If you think that’s bad California wants to pass a law so homosexuals can donate blood without having to wait three weeks without having sex.
What could go wrong first Biden now this
“Then why did you do that ?”
I provided facts to backup my position. Undisputed facts.
“See, the only one you are fooling is yourself, typical libtard believing their own propaganda.”
Was that you that yesterday implied Limbaugh was a libtard?
Ever since the National Enquirer published the picture with OJ Simpson’s shoes that he said he didn’t own I do my best to evaluate the information first and consider the source second.
Hell, even you’re right once in a while so I don’t immediately ignore your posts when I see them.
“I provided facts to backup my position. Undisputed facts.”
I went back through the exchange between you two on this topic and forgive me if I see no actual facts being cited here. Are you two continuing a conversation from another topic? If so, mind if I have the link?
Thanks.
“I went back through the exchange between you two on this topic and forgive me if I see no actual facts being cited here”
Get real. I have other posts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.