Your constant name calling and other silliness makes my points better than I ever could. I noted that there were far more studies supporting the global warming hoax than studies supporting LENR and you dispute even this? In your case the grit that I am providing is not helping you to produce a pearl just the typical muck that we find on your threads.
Your constant name calling
***If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flies like a duck, sounds like a duck and it aint a goose, it’s probably a duck. If it looks like a skeptopath, walks like a skeptopath, posts like a skeptopath, flies like a skeptopath, sounds like a skeptopath and it aint a sincere science-oriented truthseeker, it’s probably a skeptopath. I used to think name calling was uncalled for until I read through the new testament and saw how often Jesus did it. So, take that up with Him.
and other silliness makes my points better than I ever could.
***Cool, then you’re doing us a favor by staying away from those threads.
I noted that there were far more studies supporting the global warming hoax than studies supporting LENR and you dispute even this?
***I dispute 22 ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE worth of it. That’s like saying an amoeba has enough kinetic energy to knock 2 stars off their orbit. That’s how far off you are, science-boy. That, and throwing AGW into the mix is simply a whataboutism.
In your case the grit that I am providing is not helping you to produce a pearl
***OHHH, THAT’s How YOU See it! Fascinating. Then go ahead and produce your grit on your own thread. How many times do I need to remind you that this option is open and available to you? If you were REALLY interested in knocking down the supposed bad science, you’da been doing that all along. But that is not your interest — your interest is in seagulling and skeptopathy.
just the typical muck that we find on your threads.
***A lot less muck when you’re not around. So... thanks.