Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JD_UTDallas

Thank you for that post - really interesting.

That’s the trouble with trying new things - one runs the risk of running into new problems. A learning experience to be sure.


25 posted on 02/08/2022 10:00:46 PM PST by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: 21twelve

SpaceX used to launch them at 360km but if a sat fails it takes years for it to naturally decay and reenter. SpaceX is doing the right thing here by launching them into a purposely low elliptical orbit they ensure that if a sat goes black it comes down in days not years. The reason they lost these was not the extra drag it was software that once under a certain altitude and orbital velocity wouldn’t let the sats exit safe mode and use their ion engines to raise the orbit. They can and almost assuredly will change that code to allow a manual override. These sats carry plenty of fuel a 50% increase in drag would likely not pulled them back if they had full thrust on tap. It comes down to Delta V of fuel on board vs Delta V needed with the increased drag. They would still have 40 sats if they were up higher at 300+ km they are the only ones so far committed to zero orbital junk they reenter the second stages as well. The sats themselves burn up to tiny pieces none reaches the ground. Bravo SpaceX


26 posted on 02/08/2022 10:09:43 PM PST by JD_UTDallas ("Veni Vidi Vici" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson