Evidence
EVIDENCE
Because anything else is just jackassin'.
People's deaths as discussed on these type of threads are nothing by props. Just a means to an end to speculate and guess.
Then on to the next person.
Pathetic, but not surprising given a small number of FReepers who resort to this tactic.
You might want to look into that whole "reading comprehension" thing you may have heard about.
Who made you the curator of free speech!?
It's not speculation to say there is a long term track record of pharmaceutical companies willfully, or negligently hiding deaths caused by their products.
An example, would be how pharmaceutical companies deliberately covered up the risk of suicide for children taking antidepressants.
Go back to Thalidomide, which was approved in Europe. The only reason it wasn't approved in the U.S. was because of one woman, Frances Kelsey, at the FDA, who demanded more proof of safety.
Can you see why people are cynical about these things?
“ Pathetic, but not surprising given a small number of FReepers who resort to this tactic. ”
Not nearly as pathetic as when the usual suspects show up to tamp down any discussion or speculation about the dangers of the vaccines. They’re a much smaller number, but you can see them working overtime to support the narrative.
Hundreds of pro athletes falling dead? - Nothing to see here.
Story after story of children having heart attacks? - Nothing so see here.
Vaccinated people more susceptible to Omicron? - Nothing to see here.
Ivermectin saves lives? - Not enough studies to prove it
Literally dozens of studies prove it. - I don’t like those studies.
We are all aware who is pathetic.
Well, if the article would just come right out and SAY what the Cause of Death was, we wouldn't be forced to discuss this in a VACUUM, now, would we?
Regards,