If the actual virus infects someone, the damage does not happen until the spike protein appears to become decoupled from the rest of the virus.
Who would have thought getting the actual virus could be safer for the heart?
Pro tip: It isn't.
Who would have thought getting the actual virus could be safer for the heart?
Well, anyone who’s been listening to Dr Peter McCullough, for the past year.
He’s told us just this.
It’s the Faucists and $hot $hills who’ve insisted, otherwise.
It has been apparent from the beginning that the Baric-Daszak-Fauci spike protein, by itself, is deadly.
The poisons called COVID vaccines flood the systems of the people who get them with a version of the Baric-Daszak-Fauci spike protein.
Therefor, the poisons called COVID vaccines are deadly.
It's strictly about the virus and the spike proteins being found in the blood of covid patients.
"Professor Paolo Madeddu, cardiologist and the study lead from the University's Bristol Medical School, added that "microvascular complications are frequent and harmful in patients with COVID-19, with up to 11 percent of those hospitalized in intensive care units having myocardial damage or having suffered a heart attack. Furthermore, people with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases are more likely to die of COVID-19."
Who would have thought getting the actual virus could be safer for the heart?
Wait a second. You didn't say "Vaccine" in your title parenthesized comment. But you said it big time in post #1.
You even go on to claim the virus is safer for the heart than the vaccine! But the article doesn't talk about the vaccine at all and never makes the comparison.
The article claims an 11% risk of heart inflammation for covid. So what's the risk of heart inflammation for vaccines?
The initial claim was that the vaccine would stay in the arm. Clearly that's not the case. But I wonder if post vaccine behavior impacts that. For that reason when I got the vaccines, I took off work and remained largely immobile for 24 hours.