Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: haffast
There were never to be arrests, never to be a cathartic aha moment, nor a day of victory.

Because Q and her associated Qtards were then and now full of steaming poo.

3 posted on 02/03/2022 10:03:35 AM PST by humblegunner (Ain't drownin', Just wavin'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: humblegunner

Well said


10 posted on 02/03/2022 10:36:26 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner; ETCM; Renfrew; Harpotoo; Reily; Responsibility2nd; CletusVanDamme; Nifster; Kevmo; ...
The strongest argument against Q today in my opinion. There likely wouldn't have been an election hijack, media censoring or covid. As the left wouldn't have needed to keep doubling down.

I said on my very first post referring to Q was very similar to what muir_redwoods said and never changed my stance.

"Qanon has always struck me as the political equivalent of a Leftist honey trap. The people behind it may have dropped a truth or two but it’s purpose (that you can't find anyplace else, I think, is to (I said "might") discredit conservatives."

At this point in my opinion the only discredit against conservatives would be similar to Jan 6 attempted "Reichstag fire." It worked against those that are not aware.

Responsibility2nd said, "All those times we were told to trust Sessions and trust Barr was intentional disinformation"
(reasoned argument in my opinion)

roving, "I didn’t need Q to know what is going on. It’s the lies this person told how everything was going as planned that irked me
(good argument in my opinion. Though some do)

Responsibility2nd said, "If the Q program had never been launched, there would be no bitchute, rumble, getter, gab, or whatever else platform today…….
But as unbelievable as this is, it really pales in comparison to what the average Qtard believes


"but" usually means the first point was moot. You tell me is Bitchute, rumble an so on moot?


31 posted on 02/03/2022 3:55:53 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner

“””Because Q and her associated Qtards were then and now full of steaming poo.”””

Unlike you.

FReepers are lucky to have you as a gatekeeper of important information, and your opinions are free of charge too.

That anon expressed an opinion. You understand the meaning of the word “opinion” don’t you? I know that you do.


36 posted on 02/03/2022 5:40:29 PM PST by haffast (Double Standards Exist. Freedom of Speech. Patriots are Dying. Woke is hard. Anons Know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner
Because Q and her associated Qtards were then and now full of steaming poo.

Big, fat countrified lying Texas bush popper.


65 posted on 02/03/2022 8:00:20 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson