Irrelevant to this discussion.
But, if you want comparisons, here’s one.
In all of WW2, we lost to the war (depending slightly on source) ~406,000 people killed. 2 years of that (averaged) would be 0.149% of our then population (in that 2 years).
No biggie, right?
Your anointing yourself as "hall monitor" for this or any thread is preposterous.
As to the "discussion," one may conclude a number of things. The first is that comparatively, the Fauci-led response is among the worst in the world, a relevant point to some, if not you.
The WWII comparison is not new to you, but made publicly by vaccine advocate Bill Gates midway through the first of the now over two years of this pandemic. You are repeating as justification the same reasoning. Such reasoning made for economically-devastating lockdowns and attempts at mandates of all sorts, which infringe on basic liberties.
That the Fauci-led pandemic response included the "official" protocol for kidney-lethal remdesivir and also the bureaucratic suppression of all early treatments is relevant. That smear politics was discussed by the pandemic response bureaucrats as a response to disagreements with the "state agenda" is relevant.
The almost daily focus on US pandemic stats from worldometer suggests you and yours believe that site. Relevant to this discussion, it seems.
The overall mortality rate based on that site's published stats says that the worldwide mortality rate is circa 0.072 percent. That places the site's other calculations into some sort of frame.
Trust the site. Trust the data. So you say.