You raise a good point, nonetheless I would not breezily wave off the 52X higher death rate amongst the doubly vaccinated 10-14 year old group, vs the unvaccinated 10-14 year old group.
That death rate difference is huge. Has the follow-up data analysis been performed to confirm that this 52X death rate difference can be explained by the 10-14 year old children who died were destined to die (within ten months) anyways?
Do these results suggest that seriously sick children (and possibly adults) should not get vaccinated?
Though addressed to another, may I reply?
How one controls words is at play. Definitions in these last two years have been changed to comport with the marketing of mRNA products, and so in calling them "vaccines," the marketing wins.
Additionally, then the use of the word "vaccinate" gathers into itself the notion of efficacy. But the clear reality is that these mRNA products are in the midst of an ongoing phase three clinical trial of officially "experimental" injections.
So there is a world of difference between a simplified "get vaccinated" and a "participate in an ongoing and as yet unproven experiment." And for some, by the coercion of a mandate.
That is a difference worth noting.