What a bunch of pseudo-chemical crap! Ethylene oxide at 0.33mg/kg, or 0.33 mkg/g or 0.33 ng/mg. So your precious nose is exposed to nanograms of potential carcinogen at one test swab. It will probably be exposed to thousand more “carcinogens” if you step into Costco in the afternoon! The ignorance of all things chemical among general population, as well as among “scientists”, is astonishing. I blame high school system employing mostly imbeciles as science teachers.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled "Just a harmless test swab?" Werner Bergholz | COMMENTARY #28 SPECIAL (TRABSCRIPT AND LINK TO 3 MINUTE VIDEO), exinnj wrote: |
What a bunch of pseudo-chemical crap! Ethylene oxide at 0.33mg/kg, or 0.33 mkg/g or 0.33 ng/mg. So your precious nose is exposed to nanograms of potential carcinogen at one test swab. It will probably be exposed to thousand more “carcinogens” if you step into Costco in the afternoon! The ignorance of all things chemical among general population, as well as among “scientists”, is astonishing. I blame high school system employing mostly imbeciles as science teachers. |
*
I can't figure out why you're so proud of your ignorance. That's a German professor talking about standards for chemical detection and discussing relevance and you shriek, roll your eyes and complain about the high school system.
Say, when information is exposed that makes you uncomfortable, does bleating like you just did really make it all disappear?
Hey! We are trying to enjoy Fear Porn here. Keep it down
Arrogant sophistry fits you well.
You sure you didn’t cut and paste that?
First you validate his findings, And so then you play down there significance by comparing mechanically inserted carcinogens, to possibly naturally occurring carcinogenic particles in the air?
Precious nose? Really? what a massive douce bag of fallacious arrogance you toss around. How much did you pay for that education anyway?
Exactly