> The point is you misrepresented things. <
Well, I suppose I could have said “the collection of small villages that would eventually become the city of Hong Kong” instead of just saying “Hong Kong”.
> It has no bearing at all on the Falklands. <
The original poster made the connection by talking about both the Falklands and Hong Kong. He drew the comparison. I just commented on it.
Anyway, I have exhausted my interest on this topic. You may have the last word if you wish. At any rate, enjoy the weekend. Monday comes soon enough.
Sure.
I agree with your point (because it’s factual except for the last sentence).
—
> At the end of the 99 years Argentina gets control. <
One problem here is that your plan recognizes the Falklands as really belonging to Argentina.
The Falklands situation is quite different from the Hong Kong situation. Hong Kong was always a Chinese city.
—
You should have not included the last sentence and “really”.