Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative98

The Montana Department of Health emphatically writes in bolded letters that N95s that seal are the only things that might help against smoke particles (which are around 1 micron, 10 times larger than most viral virions), but warns of health risks. “Note that respirator masks should be a last resort, as they are difficult to fit correctly, decrease oxygen intake, are hot, and can easily leak when worn improperly.” They go on to add, “People who are not physically fit may experience difficulty going about daily tasks due to reduced oxygen intake. It is more important to have enough oxygen than to have clean air - if you are using a respirator and feel faint, nauseous, or have trouble breathing, take the mask off.”

On the Washington Department of Health’s website guidance for wildfires, it is made clear that “masks are not approved for children” and that “it is harder to breathe through a mask, so take breaks often if you work outside.” The Sacramento County Department of Health Services states, “N95 respirator can make it more difficult for the wearer to breathe due to carbon dioxide buildup, which reduces the intake of oxygen, increased breathing rates, and heart rates.”

Just a year ago, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky swatted down the idea of wearing N95s. “They’re very hard to breathe in when you wear them properly,” Walensky said. “They’re very hard to tolerate when you wear them for long periods of time.”

Thus, whether we are talking about masks or N95s, it’s quite evident that they are either unsafe or ineffective. They can often be both unsafe and ineffective, but they can never be effective without being unsafe, unless worn by the right person with the right training in limited environments for short periods of time.


2 posted on 01/24/2022 8:16:24 AM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: conservative98

I treat this like I treated the swine flu. I read the headline and move on - ignoring the story.

Except I’m willing to post to say that because of the nuttery of our government (and others) regarding this whole thing.


4 posted on 01/24/2022 8:20:15 AM PST by cuban leaf (My prediction: Harris is Spiro Agnew. We'll soon see who becomes Gerald Ford, and our next prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

QFT:

“They can often be both unsafe and ineffective, but they can never be effective without being unsafe, unless worn by the right person with the right training in limited environments for short periods of time.”

Excellent summary line - I’m not an Industrial Hygienist but the safety training I have had totally aligns with that statement. I attempted to point this reality out to a very smug Covidian who objected to my maskless condition while wearing her KN95 with full confidence of being virus-proof because she “followed the science”.


10 posted on 01/24/2022 8:43:48 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson