| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness is as low as MINUS 105% among the Triple Vaccinated according to latest UKHSA report, MortMan wrote: |
I know this report is not from a well known source, but it does cite official data. Other sources from other countries have provided similar claims and cited data. It strikes me that the US authorities claim exact opposite conclusions, usually without providing analysis of actual data. Usually it’s just a statement from Wallensky or proclamation from Fauci. Why don’t we have actual data-driven debates? Or is that another epidemic of the unvaccinated? |
*
I've noticed in the past that when I post these articles, I get people demanding I prove what is said, show the page, quote the text and then defend the data collection, but all Walensky or Fauci has to say is, "We're seeing evidence...." and all is well. They both advocated for pregnant women to get the vax with those magic words, "We're seeing evidence...."
Normally, pharmas have to release their raw data before vaccines are implemented, but that didn't happen with Covid vaccines. No one official or in the MSM had the least concern with ever seeing any proof. Those who critique these articles I post line by line had no interest in seeing the raw data from the trials.
I’m with you. I wish the US authorities would at least try to convince us with evidence, rather than decree to us in arrogance.
My comments on the site and cited data were made to differentiate the CDC’s approach of data-free “debate”.