(will you be willing to renounce on the possibility of getting taken care of in hospitals?)
And what if the jab is what makes you ill?
Will you pick up the tab for those folks?
The real moral issue here is: If the authorities can limit or curtail treatment because of the patient's "intransigence" re. vaxxination - what's to prevent them from denying care for any of a slew of other supposed "sins" (failure to get jabbed for some other, unrelated malady like papillomaviruses; refusal to modify a sedentary lifestyle; eating meat; etc.)?
It's a slippery slope! Don't they realize this?
Regards,