Eternal Vigilance means looking at everything.
To defame us you bring to the table a list of things that have been looked at
and have been found to be lacking definitive proof. (Some of which was
sourced from clowns in the first place with poorly concealed malicious intent.)
Though some of those things may be possible, and may even be proven in time,
you cannot produce anyone that believes all or even most of your list is proven
fact today.
I CAN produce a lot of folks that believe the produced proof that the election
WAS stolen,
( https://cdn.michaeljlindell.com/downloads/fix2020first/states-v-us-and-states-compl-2021-11-23.pdf )
the resident “President” is a pedophile,
( https://media.giphy.com/media/llaXfSLkAO3k3Wg0JA/source.gif )
and the “Plandemic” is an act of evil, being used reduce liberty and life.
( https://media.sailthru.com/composer/images/sailthru-prod-3ia/Glenn%20Beck%20-%20Crimes%20Or%20Cover-Up%20-%20Research%20-%20UPDATE.pdf )
All you can produce seem to be rants against people engaging in vigilance.
(And your insistence that the usurping PedoDementoCorruptoCrat is not a
“Proven pedophile” because you have not seen any evidence of “Boning”.)
A blatant “Whoopi” style “Not Real Rape, Rape” position, if ever there was one.
~Easy
I guess I missed the blanket dismissal of all that craziness on the Qtard threads.
It was allowed to stand and remains a part of your Qtardian belief system.
This totally negates anything else you tards decide to promote.
You are tarred with it. Tarred tards, in essence.
It’s not defaming! Humblegunner may have a challenging personality but on this he’s right!
I saw all those on Humblegunner’s list argued in the affirmative on FR Q threads through Q (Starting Date) until say 6 months ago. (HG: You missed the containerships stuck in the Suez Canal being full of kidnapped kids!) Now whether it’s part of the standard catechism for what Q followers think & beleive I can’t say. You don’t see them argued for now which is good.
