Posted on 01/17/2022 11:09:28 AM PST by Grandpa Drudge
Sorry, Kevmo, but
***Sorry, gramps, but you are just covering up for bein’ lazy.
you missed the simplest point.
***Nothin’ simple about your point. Your actions were indistinguishable from blogpimping.
When you follow the link to the article “Read more at spiked-online.com ...” from the heading of the thread, the text presented includes highlighted links (colored font) to supporting or additional information, which are sometimes very important.
***Dude. You did not even address the simple question asked in the title. All that nonsense that you claim is “sometimes important” is just clickbait, and you sent us freepers over to a clickbait site when it wasn’t even necessary because it aint on the excerpt-only list. That isn’t sumthin that is just “sometimes important” it’s ALWAYS important.
That is especially true in this case,
***Uhh, no it isn’t. You haven’t shown that to be the case, you’re still stuck on some hypothetical that it coulda been the case.
and your “copying” of the complete text ignores and misses these links.
***My copying of the text ignores all that clickbait stuff. If a person wants more info they can click through to the article and suffer all those ads, malware, cookies, and fake information.
As a result, very important information is missing in your posting of the “complete” article.
***You’re just reiterating your assertion without any factual backup whatsoever.
The “excerpt” should be
***should be only done when the source is on the excerpt-only list or the article is hundreds of pages long and you’re saving FR some bits & bytes worth of storage.
just enough to help determine if the reader is even interested in this post or not,
***You posted a question on the headline, didn’t even answer it because you are so lazy, and you persist in defending your actions which are a detriment to freeperhood.
in the long run saving everyone precious time.
***You’re just throwing words around now. I’ve shown multiple ways you haven’s saved any freepers any time. You exposed freepers to all kinds of timesink just because you’re lazy.
YFPWBIBM
Distracting from the issue at hand? What issue, the one where you’re too lazy and inconsiderate of other freepers to simply post the article? Or are you considering FReeping to be a waste of time? You have lazy thought processes, gramps.
I see you’ve met the Tar-Baby as well...
Looks like you’re fighting a two-front war.
BTW, thanks for posting the whole article. It has saved me time. Very considerate.
I see you’re back to your stalking self, jumping across thread boundaries in your quest to be the best stalker on FR. Good luck with that.
I just HATE it when evidence of this is posted!!
To: Elsie You asked for ‘handy’ math. Increase the size of the thing, increase the weight of it by the same number of orders of magnitude. You had a lot of trouble with orders of magnitude before, as I recall. You were off by more than 100 orders of magnitude. I can see why you’re confused. Maybe this exercise will get you over that threshold of understanding. |
Oh, cool, thanks for the reminder that you’ve been off by over a hundred orders of magnitude in the past and you continue to be off by orders of magnitude even now.
Let’s use an analogy. When a really stupid person starts criticizing math the way you do, they can’t reconcile what simple stuff like kinetic energy is. They think that just because it has the word ‘energy’ in it, it’s somehow scientifically magical. They think that a typical flea has enough kinetic energy to knock over a full grown elephant. But that’s only being off by about 9 or 10 orders of magnitude because a flea is on the order of maybe a half gram and an elephant is on the order of a few thousand kilograms.
To see how stupid your 100 orders of magnitude error is, it’s more like saying an ameoeba has enough kinetic energy to knock out our sun out of its position in the heavens. Ameobas have a mass of micrograms, 10^-6g
Since the sun has a mass of about 2 x 10^30 kg, you’re at a difference in mass of about 39 or 40 orders of magnitude. So you’re so stupid as to be claiming that an ordinary amoeba has enough mass in its everyday jumping around to knock out 3 suns in one collision.
Yeah, that’s pretty dimwitted, pretty stupid. I can see why you would wanna cover that up and keep pushing like you do, hoping that no one notices how stupid you are about... math.
The "Tar-Baby" certainly seems to be intent on discrediting and destroying informative conversations he thinks are not up to his "standards".
Not to worry. Awareness of this political propaganda issue is growing rapidly, and public attention will continue to improve as the real science is publicized. I'll be back in future FR threads.
I see. OK for thee*, but not for me.
Gotcha.
* Oh, cool, thanks for the reminder that you’ve been off by over a hundred orders of magnitude in the past and you continue to be off by orders of magnitude even now.
You have exhibited on this thread as well that you suq at math. But your stalking and trolling skills are top notch, so there’s that.
We both have exhibited many things in these threads.
Matthew 12:36-37
But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.
Good to know about you. I think I’ll choose to spend a few thousand years in Heaven holding you accountable to those >100 orders of magnitude you were wrong in your math, which is a form of careless word. Lookin’ forward to it, TTFN.
“Leak” is such a false-choice alternative. Drives me crazy.
Wow, you’re quite the coward, gramps, to talk about a FReeper and call him a racist remark and all that bullshiite behind his back.
The term “cautionary tale” is found at the bottom of Wikipedia’s “tar baby” entry.
You should look these up, because then at least you would know what you’re talking about. And then we can comment further on what “ certainly seems to be intent” of yours to be a straightup jerkwad. Feel free to post that wikipedia entry to enlighten us that such is not the issue in your case.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar-Baby
Racist interpretation
Although the term “tar baby” is documented as coming from a folktale of African origin, its modern meaning in America is different. Many consider tar baby to be a pejorative term for African Americans.[20] The Oxford English Dictionary mentions tar baby as “a contemptuous term for a black person”,[21] and the subscription version also mentions “a derogatory term for a Black (U.S.) or a Maori (N.Z.)”.[1][22]
Several United States politicians—including presidential party nominees John Kerry, John McCain, Mitt Romney[23]—have been criticized by civil rights leaders, the media, and fellow politicians for using the “tar baby” metaphor.[22][24] An article in The New Republic argued that people are “unaware that some consider it to have a second meaning as a slur” and it “is an obscure slur, not even known to be so by a substantial proportion of the population”. It continued that, “those who feel that tar baby’s status as a slur is patently obvious are judging from the fact that it sounds like a racial slur”.[25]
See also
Cautionary tale
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cautionary_tale
It seems that it’ll take more than us to get him to see the light.
Supporting evidence from the teams Glen Beck found:
https://media.sailthru.com/composer/images/sailthru-prod-3ia/Glenn%20Beck%20-%20Crimes%20Or%20Cover-Up%20-%20Research%20-%20UPDATE.pdf
It featured a PDF containing the following…
RESEARCH
/// GLENN BECK
PART 1 /////////////
THE VACCINE ARMS RACE:
WHO WERE THE PEOPLE AND LABS INVOLVED?
Baric email: “honorarium” from Ecohealth
https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/EHAfunds_2017_Baric-Files.pdf
Baric and Shi email
https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NAS_Galveston_ZLS_Emails_2017_Baric-Files.pdf
Ecohealth proposal to DARPA
https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/main-document-preempt-volume-1-no-ess-hr00118s0017-ecohealth-alliance.pdf
NIH Moderna docs
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6935295-NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements
Dr Baric’s 2005 progress report:
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F3-540-26765-4_8
DoD Emergency Supplemental Appropriations
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-109publ148/html/PLAW-109publ148.htm
Dr Baric 2007 research update
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17222058/
Dr Shi and Peter Daszak research update
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12250-013-3402-x.pdf
US funding to Ecohealth Alliance
https://www.usaspending.gov/award/ASST_NON_R01AI110964_7529
Dr Baric and Dr Shi 2015 published research
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/
Dr Baric issues first correction (2016)
https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0416-446d
Dr Shi publishes her own research (2017)
https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1006698
Wuhan 2020 published research
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2312-y
PART 2
THE PANDEMIC BEGINS
Wuhan doc Security (make sure google translates so it’s not in Chinese)
https://archive.md/tUi75
Wuhan doc air system (make sure google translates so it’s not in Chinese)
https://archive.md/bfoTD
Wuhan doc air incinerator (make sure google translates so it’s not in Chinese)
https://archive.md/Jifqr#selection-229.0-229.197
PART 3
Censorship & Cover-UP: The crime of the century
Baric emails (Just print these pages: 3, 5, 10, 11, 50, 116, 120, 123)
https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Baric-Emails-2.17.21.pdf
Fauci emails (Just print these pages: 100, 3188-3192, 3221, 3206, 3197, 3198)
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/20793561/leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails.pdf
Droegemeier letter
https://web.archive.org/web/20200302060453/https:/www.nationalacademies.org/includes/OSTP%20Coronavirus%20Request%20to%20NASEM_02.06.2020.pdf
Dr Baric’s 2020 research correction
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242891/
CDC emails
https://www.scribd.com/document/536749738/CDC-Emails#download&from_embed
- Click https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/p/prometheus-hub-a-covid-19-origin to Find additional research from Charles Rixey.
- We ALSO want to thank DRASTIC Research for their tireless pursuit of the truth.
Click https://drasticresearch.org/ to find all of their in depth work.
/// GLENN BECK
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.