Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom56v2

So I just read the complete court transcript. For the record its Pisano and Pisano vs. Mayo Clinic Florida, Case Number 2021-CA-6754 in the county of Duval, Florida.

There are a lot of fascinating facts of this case. In no particular order...

1. The physician expert for plaintiff is not board certified in any medical specialty
2. The one case where he gave ivermectin (Baptist hospital) the patient subsequently died
3. The physician has never given any ivermectin on ventilated patients — and is not privileged in critical care medicine
4. The evidence on the record clearly demonstrates that ivermectin has mixed literature reviews and is not a “silver bullet”
5. The ruling states that the patient chose Mayo, which is a closed medical staff
6. The judge in his ruling on the merits states that he cannot force a member of the community onto a closed medical staff
7. The testimony of the physician states that patients have been discharged from the hospital and that the patients were then treated. It is curious (not a part of the ruling) that is the patients were discharged — they were probably better
8. The case was heard within 2 hours of the emergency petition. the hearing took 3 hours and ruling on the merits was from the bench

The ruling looks pretty solid. I would encourage everyone either pro or against ivermectin to read the testimony around ivermectin (essentially that there are studies both for and and against and the physician is ultimately forced to acknowledge this ). The most salient line in the whole testimony is that the court was being asked to take off its black robe and put on a white coat. The evidence shows that there is legitimate disagreement as to the roll of ivermectin in CoVID, and as such the court refused to intervene.

It is an impressive testimony and ruling. I would encourage anyone to read it as it crystalized many of the issues that we debate everyday here.

The current status of the case is at the appeals level as of 1.13.

Anyone who is interested in a factual look at the legal arguments — its all in the public record and very interesting.


51 posted on 01/16/2022 6:48:24 PM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr

What the judge means is sorry, He signed his own death warrant. Nothing I can do.


56 posted on 01/16/2022 6:58:44 PM PST by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson