So you have edited my answers to fit your narrative. Please see all my answers in full. Its ok, we will not be able to agree on the definitions.
I hope you have a nice evening
You edited my responses, so one assumes that is the rule of discussion with you. My "narrative" is that the "emergency use authorization" continues in phase three clinical trials with legal shielding of mRNA injection manufacturers (plural). If that is what you think is a "narrative," so be it. Yours must be a different "narrative."
-- "Please see all my answers in full."
I have. Full and closely.
-- "Its ok, we will not be able to agree on the definitions."
I'll stick with the FDA's official continuance of the EUA and statements that the "experimental" phase three trials continue under that "emergency" declaration.
I also observe that the FDA has asked for decades to release the trials' data, which sullies an argument for informed consent."
Happy Saturday as it wanes.