Same goes for the vacks then eh?
This would be all the more hypocritical if they were on death row.
You have failed to answer the question. The vaccines came with informed consent. No one is sneaking up on people roving them a vaccine without their knowledge. These prisoners were not told and had no consent. Informed or otherwise
It is concerning that several have said they got better so that should mean there is no problem. If that isn’t the first step in the slippery slope to tyranny, I don’t know what is.
I am simply asking will those who scream at the top of the lungs that vaccines are without consent and experimental (they are not) take the same position that this is Mengele like medicine and there is no consent for experimental (off label) therapy? It appears not. It appears the answer is as long as you agree with it your will can be imposed without choice on someone else.
How is this different than a vaccine mandate. Or horrifyingly worse. How is this different than getting vaccinated without consent by a sudden attack.
These four inmates were not told they were getting ivermectin. They had no choice.
I have always advocated for choices. I absolutely disagree with mandatory vaccine. Do you disagree that patients should not be given something without a choice. Everyone who has been vaccinated has made a choice to roll up their sleeve and receive it. These four people did not.