To: Westbrook
They’re right. It was a DIFFERENT regulation that they used to mandate vax for federal contractors. However a DIFFERENT court case has that one suspended as well.
5 posted on
01/14/2022 12:51:34 PM PST by
TalonDJ
To: TalonDJ
However a DIFFERENT court case has that one suspended as well.Yes...that was a couple of months ago I thought!
9 posted on
01/14/2022 12:54:22 PM PST by
gr8eman
(When you're bought and paid for by commies...you're a commie!)
To: TalonDJ
They’re right. It was a DIFFERENT regulation that they used to mandate vax for federal contractors. However a DIFFERENT court case has that one suspended as well.
10 posted on
01/14/2022 12:55:56 PM PST by
fidelis
(Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia! )
To: TalonDJ
They’re right. It was a DIFFERENT regulation that they used to mandate vax for federal contractors.
Yep..there are already clauses in the FAR and DFAR regs and have been flowed down on the majority of contracts awarded over the last couple months.
16 posted on
01/14/2022 1:05:02 PM PST by
ratzoe
To: TalonDJ
However a DIFFERENT court case has that one suspended as well.Exactly
25 posted on
01/14/2022 1:27:42 PM PST by
frogjerk
(I will not do business with fascists)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson